You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The dataservice replaces any participant2_to_participant1_relation value that you set if your participant1_to_participant2_relation is in its list of basic reverse relationships.
The dataservice will always replace "Daughter" with "Child", because it says that "Child" is the reverse of "Mother". Is this forced replacement behavior intentional?
Should all family relationships be sexless? Should we be sending "Parent" instead of "Mother" and "Father" and rely on the participant sex field?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fiendish
changed the title
dataservice replaces sent reverse family relationships
dataservice replaces specific reverse family relationships with generic ones
Oct 24, 2018
The dataservice replaces any
participant2_to_participant1_relation
value that you set if yourparticipant1_to_participant2_relation
is in its list of basic reverse relationships.So if you submit e.g.
The dataservice will always replace "Daughter" with "Child", because it says that "Child" is the reverse of "Mother". Is this forced replacement behavior intentional?
Should all family relationships be sexless? Should we be sending "Parent" instead of "Mother" and "Father" and rely on the participant sex field?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: