Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing test cases for multi-valued reference maps #108

Open
chrdebru opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Missing test cases for multi-valued reference maps #108

chrdebru opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
proposal issue has a proposal to be solved test-cases Test cases need to be updated

Comments

@chrdebru
Copy link
Contributor

chrdebru commented Mar 4, 2024

As the title implies, we should have some where multi-valued term maps are used to generate multiple subjects, objects, predicates, ... from one iteration.

@dachafra
Copy link
Member

dachafra commented Jul 4, 2024

As this is about test-cases, I'll assign it to @DylanVanAssche. Please, decide if we go for this now, or we will wait for a future release of test-cases (i.e. working-group label)

@dachafra dachafra assigned DylanVanAssche and unassigned andimou and pmaria Jul 4, 2024
@DylanVanAssche
Copy link
Collaborator

@dachafra We need to have an example first to know what the behavior is that we expect, I'm not entirely sure.
How does a multi-value term map look like (with data in and out?)> @chrdebru

@pmaria pmaria self-assigned this Jul 4, 2024
@pmaria
Copy link
Collaborator

pmaria commented Jul 4, 2024

I can add test cases for this. I want to clean up and rearrange the test cases anyway.

@DylanVanAssche
Copy link
Collaborator

@pmaria That would be great!

@dachafra dachafra added the proposal issue has a proposal to be solved label Jul 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
proposal issue has a proposal to be solved test-cases Test cases need to be updated
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants