Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement]: Add more astrophysical models #314

Open
3 of 5 tasks
taylorbell57 opened this issue May 9, 2022 · 1 comment
Open
3 of 5 tasks

[Enhancement]: Add more astrophysical models #314

taylorbell57 opened this issue May 9, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request LC Fit

Comments

@taylorbell57
Copy link
Collaborator

taylorbell57 commented May 9, 2022

Instrument

Light curve fitting (Stages 4-6)

What is your suggestion?

The astrophysical models that we mentioned during our meeting today that we'd like to at least investigate adding to Eureka are:

  • catwoman (for asymmetric transits)
  • spiderman (for phase curves and eclipse mapping); may not be worthwhile given how extremely time-consuming it is. If we do add it, we should sparsely compute it and interpolate in time
  • starry (for transits, eclipse mapping, and phase curves. This depends on pymc3; I have already started adding starry while working on Issue Add PyMC3 as a S5 sampling method #265)
  • eigencurves/eigenmapping (Megan's code for eclipse mapping)

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@taylorbell57
Copy link
Collaborator Author

FYI, I now have well functioning and modular code for starry+pymc3 that just needs tests and documentation. I'll try to have a PR submitted for that before the end of the month in prep for the MIRI ERS observations

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request LC Fit
Projects
Status: To do
Status: In progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants