Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
We have Lines 338 to 344 in 7b33e59 Either way, I'm in favor of supporting this use case. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
-
Can't you already get to the GenericAPIServer within the server struct? And then add handlers? (UnprotectedHandlerSomething) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Im working on project, based on KCP where I would like to extend existing KCP API server with some arbitrary
http.Handers
This would be very similar how now KCP is being enabled to use
syncer tunners
:This way in my use-case I would be able to dynamically provision routes under handler in my control.
Proposal would be:
This would enable to hook almost any handlers (assuming security and logic is out of KCP scope for those),
Would something like this would be acceptable OR maybe there is already way to achieve this today?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions