You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I’m a student at NYU's Center for Data Science, working with @VickySteeves this summer on an accessibility audit for Jupyter Notebooks. I was trained by NYU IT's Accessibility Office to be able to do a full audit. I've gone through Jupyter Notebook version 6.0.0, using notebooks from the Data 8 course materials as examples, and VoiceOver on Mac for screen reader testing. Below I’ve included some critical accessibility issues as starting points, along with a Google Doc for more details. I also have a spreadsheet of the complete audit I performed, showing the pages I tested, which areas did not pass WCAG 2.0. Each bolded point under the “Test Procedure” column links to the corresponding section on WCAG 2.0 for reference. I also referenced WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices for examples on design patterns.
Accessible name missing for folder/file icons
Status changes are not announced for assistive technologies
Graphs generated by code need alternative way to convey information
Menu items are difficult to access with keyboard
Keyboard trap
Code editor mode or Command mode information not conveyed
Discussion on what to do with this information is on Discourse
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, I’m a student at NYU's Center for Data Science, working with @VickySteeves this summer on an accessibility audit for Jupyter Notebooks. I was trained by NYU IT's Accessibility Office to be able to do a full audit. I've gone through Jupyter Notebook version 6.0.0, using notebooks from the Data 8 course materials as examples, and VoiceOver on Mac for screen reader testing. Below I’ve included some critical accessibility issues as starting points, along with a Google Doc for more details. I also have a spreadsheet of the complete audit I performed, showing the pages I tested, which areas did not pass WCAG 2.0. Each bolded point under the “Test Procedure” column links to the corresponding section on WCAG 2.0 for reference. I also referenced WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices for examples on design patterns.
Discussion on what to do with this information is on Discourse
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: