You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As far as I understand, if the WF-rate is for example 1 Hz, kiwid will take a spectrum snapshot each second and then add it to the waterfall.
It would be nice if there was some averaging/integrating of all available spectrum snapshots between the updates on the web interface.
That should give a smoother waterfall appearance if WF-rate is slower than the "fast" setting. It should also increase the visual SNR, if values are integrated (since noise averages out and signal adds up).
Thanks for your continuous effort. Appreciate it much. Take care.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As far as I understand, if the WF-rate is for example 1 Hz, kiwid will take a spectrum snapshot each second and then add it to the waterfall.
It would be nice if there was some averaging/integrating of all available spectrum snapshots between the updates on the web interface.
That should give a smoother waterfall appearance if WF-rate is slower than the "fast" setting. It should also increase the visual SNR, if values are integrated (since noise averages out and signal adds up).
Thanks for your continuous effort. Appreciate it much. Take care.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: