Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the p5*js Video container as now it is not responsive. #6

Open
jinsel opened this issue Oct 2, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Fix the p5*js Video container as now it is not responsive. #6

jinsel opened this issue Oct 2, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@jinsel
Copy link
Owner

jinsel commented Oct 2, 2020

The p5*js Video container as now it is not responsive and its position is fixed right now, or you can show some creativity to change the design.

@sandy9808
Copy link

please add more detail, which container and in which file ?

@KolatimiDave
Copy link

I've been trying to find the p5*js container, please more clarity

@jinsel
Copy link
Owner Author

jinsel commented Oct 3, 2020

So as right now , in computer vision -> image classifier there is file called sketch.js which is an p5js file where you need to modify.

@KolatimiDave
Copy link

Alright i just checked the sketch.js and noticed that in the console it returns an error. I'm trying to learn and understand the library you used in order to debug. I think you should check to see if see too at the console fwml/images/classify-images/.

@TangguhDP
Copy link

Hey i can try to make it responsive! would you like to use bootstrap to make it more easy to be responsive, or you just want it to be pure css thing??? Thank you. and also you should have some menu button/link to go ./computer_vision/image_classifier/image.html it's kinda hard for the others who did not use p5js before to figure it out

@jinsel
Copy link
Owner Author

jinsel commented Oct 3, 2020

@TangguhDP yeah sure , try to use pure CSS.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants