You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are using quite distant fork of this project, but the issue originates here. Every fork in the chain retains it unquestioned, so i dare to ask at the source.
Having every markdown_to_* retval tailed with line feed is a bug in our books. If the line is removed, 9 of 22 tests fails in various strange ways. Our use cases are quite simple and fall in the 13 passing tests, but we would like to contribute an universally working improvement. No linefeed in, no linefeed out. Is it possible? It might be an indispensable parser preprocessing hack in which case we will give up and just remove the linefeeds on our end.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not active maintaining this project any more (I'm focusing my efforts now on jgm/cmark), so you'll have to attack this at some downstream point.
+++ Pavel Zdeněk [Aug 05 15 09:58 ]:
We are using quite distant fork of this project, but the issue
originates here. Every fork in the chain retains it unquestioned, so i
dare to ask at the source.
[1]https://github.com/jgm/peg-markdown/blob/2dfff24fb877bca11efe2cf9131
6f4abd3ef016a/markdown_lib.c#L47
Having every markdown_to_* retval tailed with line feed is a bug in our
books. If the line is removed, 9 of 22 tests fails in various strange
ways. Our use cases are quite simple and fall in the 13 passing tests,
but we would like to contribute an universally working improvement. No
linefeed in, no linefeed out. Is it possible?
—
Reply to this email directly or [2]view it on GitHub.
We are using quite distant fork of this project, but the issue originates here. Every fork in the chain retains it unquestioned, so i dare to ask at the source.
peg-markdown/markdown_lib.c
Line 47 in 2dfff24
Having every
markdown_to_*
retval tailed with line feed is a bug in our books. If the line is removed, 9 of 22 tests fails in various strange ways. Our use cases are quite simple and fall in the 13 passing tests, but we would like to contribute an universally working improvement. No linefeed in, no linefeed out. Is it possible? It might be an indispensable parser preprocessing hack in which case we will give up and just remove the linefeeds on our end.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: