Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add function to create general dagsync blockhook function #144

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

gammazero
Copy link
Collaborator

A general blockhook function is commonly used by clients of this library when segmented syncs are enbled.

A general blockhook function is commonly used by clients of this library when segmented syncs are enbled.
@gammazero gammazero force-pushed the make-blockhook-func branch from 1bde175 to 1568378 Compare January 9, 2024 17:23
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 54 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (f8c9474) 61.64% compared to head (66d25e1) 60.72%.

Files Patch % Lines
ingest/schema/types.go 0.00% 35 Missing ⚠️
dagsync/option.go 0.00% 19 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #144      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.64%   60.72%   -0.93%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines        4936     4990      +54     
==========================================
- Hits         3043     3030      -13     
- Misses       1567     1633      +66     
- Partials      326      327       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gammazero gammazero merged commit 5250e76 into main Jan 10, 2024
7 checks passed
@gammazero gammazero deleted the make-blockhook-func branch January 10, 2024 19:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants