-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvement suggestions #28
Comments
For MiNoPy there were some FAQs. We should transfer what is useful to MiaplPy. |
Suggest to use a different symbol for the step number announcement then MintPy. This will make it easier to know whether it stalled in MiaplPy proper or MintPy. Currently we have:
For MiaplPy we could use, e.g.:
or |
Edited 30 Oct:
|
In the unwrapping step the
|
miaplpyApp.py has the In the Is it possible to have |
When a previously run command is run again, are we consistent regarding overwriting? ISCE overwrites everything which is how it should be.
only gives the message:
without doing anything. |
Useful information to provide in
|
The order of arguments of
|
There are a few python scripts where the errors don't show up in stderr (*.e) file but in the *.o file. I suspect the error below is created by snaphu. Redirecting the error or checking for file existence prior to running snaphu may solve this.
|
The number of connections is not consistent with ISCE naming: |
Make all options consistent with MIntPy. Instead of
|
The Miami example data template files has some weired options. I would create an additional zenodo archive with a cleaned-up file:
|
Here two suggestions
- run_files directory :
It would be good to have two directories:
miaplpy/run_files
forrun_01_*
torun_03_*
andmiaplpy/network_single_reference/run_files
forrun_04*
torun_09_*
- interferogram.networkType option
Given that a directory
network_sequential_3
ornetwork_sequential_5
is generated, it would be helpful to have the ability to optionally specify the network aswith
interferogram.numConn
being read from thesequential_3
string. Similar for the Delaunay network options (which I have not tried). That would make it easier and cleaner to compare results for different networksThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: