Latest loopy produces many warnings #880
-
Since updating our loopy fork we are seeing a lot of warnings like:
and
Do you have any advice as to how we should go about resolving these? I assume there must be some new metadata associated with domains, or assignments or similar that we are not specifying? Thanks in advance. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Converting to discussion since IIUC everything is operating as intended. The warning concerns a fast path for loopy's "scheduler" (loop-nest-order-er). This was added in #350, and the fast path has asymptotically lower cost than the old version. The warning says that the fast path can't be used because there is a loop nesting constraint (via |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Converting to discussion since IIUC everything is operating as intended.
The warning concerns a fast path for loopy's "scheduler" (loop-nest-order-er). This was added in #350, and the fast path has asymptotically lower cost than the old version. The warning says that the fast path can't be used because there is a loop nesting constraint (via
prioritize_loops
) between sibling (i.e. non-nested) loops. This is not a sensible request; hence the fast path refuses to proceed. Removing the offending nesting constraints might make the fast path usable (and may even lead to improved code gen times). HTH.