Skip to content

Latest loopy produces many warnings #880

Answered by inducer
connorjward asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Converting to discussion since IIUC everything is operating as intended.

The warning concerns a fast path for loopy's "scheduler" (loop-nest-order-er). This was added in #350, and the fast path has asymptotically lower cost than the old version. The warning says that the fast path can't be used because there is a loop nesting constraint (via prioritize_loops) between sibling (i.e. non-nested) loops. This is not a sensible request; hence the fast path refuses to proceed. Removing the offending nesting constraints might make the fast path usable (and may even lead to improved code gen times). HTH.

Replies: 1 comment 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@connorjward
Comment options

@connorjward
Comment options

Answer selected by connorjward
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #877 on November 12, 2024 23:23.