Add a new selector type: regex selector

[He-Pin]

We have some fields in object/array , which is generated by backend, with name header_$id, I would like to select it with regex.

[gregsdennis]

Hey there @He-Pin. We actually have some support for that in the RFC. There are two regex functions, match() and search().

match() is implicitly anchored and will match on the full string.

search() is unanchored and will match on substrings.

Both use a flavor of regex called i-regexp, which was developed to be a compatible subset of most commonly used regex engines.

[He-Pin]

I checked that but seem will not match our usage.

{
  "data": {
    "header_1": {
      "a": "1",
      "b": "2",
      "body": "{\"c\":\"3\"}"
    },
    "header_2": {
      "a": "1",
      "b": "2",
      "body": "{\"c\":\"3\"}"
    }
  }
}

background: we want to select some json fields for translation. tried java jsonpath implementation. as the json above, we want to select the fields header_1 and header_2 first, does that supported with the current rfc?

I was using $.data[?(@.keys() =~ /header_\d+/i)] but doesn't work. so now, I'm implementation one base on the RFC and with the extended grammar:

regexSelector: /string-literal/

then I can write $[data][/header_\d+/]

as you can see, the main point here we are select on object children's property name

[gregsdennis]

Oh, you want the property names to be matched, not the values.

That, I think is likely going to be covered by #516, which is the piece you're missing. Once you can access the property names, you should be able to pass them into the functions.

[He-Pin]

I think we need the pointer to the child property name, maybe key() not keys().

[He-Pin]

@gregsdennis as #109 , I have implemented this with a new selector RegExpSelector which works on ObjectNode's properties' name.

[gregsdennis]

@He-Pin it's great that you've been able to implement it, but be aware that because it's not a standard behavior, it's not interoperable.

We'll leave this open as an idea for a possible JSON Path v2, but there's no such discussion at the moment. Continuing to push this idea in the short term isn't going to make that happen any faster.

[He-Pin]

Understand , as it's an internal needs, which should be fine.

[gregsdennis]

Another aspect of adding a regex selector is that there's no way to specify what kind of matching you want, which is why we have match() and search() functions rather than a simple ~= operator.

[He-Pin]

Yes, as it's a valid name too. but the name selector is inside '$name' but the regex selector inside a /$regex/