New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Testing with other proving systems supported by circom #89

Open

jimthematrix opened this issue Sep 30, 2024 · 0 comments

Assignees

Contributor

jimthematrix commented Sep 30, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Nova
Plonk
Marlin

First of all, we need to test the circuits and the token implementations with these different proving systems.

We should also think about how to capture the support for those different proving systems. There are differences in the following aspects:

proof format: right now the client/test code and solidity code both assume the groth16 proof format
proving keys generation
verifier Solidity: the current naming conventions for the file names don't take the proving system into account, although the contract names do have the proving system name in it
client sdk: how much would the client SDK in golang and node.js have to change to support multiple proving systems?

Chengxuan self-assigned this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment