-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Work for background-image / inline #7
Comments
Any word on this yet, somewhat unusable for most the prod environments I handle. Thanks! |
Stop using background images for everything :P |
Ha, no. On 12 Jan 2016, 14:43 +0100, Joe [email protected], wrote:
|
Here's what I'm thinking:
This would be opt-in for themes, and wouldn't affect any pages you haven't explicitly opted in to. Fair bit less automagic than normal images, but should work pretty nicely. @noeltock Sound groovy? |
Yes, I like. I know it's not sexy in a traditional jQuery drop-in way, but definitely needed. Any performance or other issues you forsee doing this? |
The main issue will be image pop-in when the full image loads, as it'll need a different animation process. Not too concerned about the integration sexiness, as it's a developer-focussed lib/plugin anyway, and background images are going to be custom coded anyway. |
Just spotted this old issue after a PR review. If the background image is relevant to the content there's a CSS prop called Might need to test that method works with Gaussholder though but don't see why it shouldn't. |
Often use
background-image
inline to dynamically cover areas.Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: