You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Structured data types (graphs etc.) might often be most efficiently stored as multiple columns, which then need to be combined during feature decoding
Although it is currently possible to nest features as structs, my impression is that in particular when dealing with e.g. a feature composed of multiple numpy array / ArrayXD's, it would be more efficient to store each ArrayXD as a separate column (though I'm not sure by how much)
Perhaps specification / implementation could be supported by something like:
Defining efficient composite feature types based on numpy arrays for representing data such as graphs with multiple node and edge attributes is currently challenging.
Your contribution
Possibly able to contribute
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature request
Structured data types (graphs etc.) might often be most efficiently stored as multiple columns, which then need to be combined during feature decoding
Although it is currently possible to nest features as structs, my impression is that in particular when dealing with e.g. a feature composed of multiple numpy array / ArrayXD's, it would be more efficient to store each ArrayXD as a separate column (though I'm not sure by how much)
Perhaps specification / implementation could be supported by something like:
Motivation
Defining efficient composite feature types based on numpy arrays for representing data such as graphs with multiple node and edge attributes is currently challenging.
Your contribution
Possibly able to contribute
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: