Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Velbus add quality_scale.yaml #131377

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cereal2nd
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed change

Add quality_scale.yaml to vvelbus

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @brefra, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (velbus) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of velbus can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign velbus Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

@allenporter allenporter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reading through the integration code and the checklist it seems like a bunch of the rules marked as done were not done. Perhaps you need to look a lot closer at the rules? or i'm misunderstanding a bunch of what is going on here.

brands: done
common-modules: done
config-flow-test-coverage: done
config-flow: done
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some config flow steps are missing data_description.

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
rules:
# Bronze
action-setup: done
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The actions are setup in async_setup_entry and the new best practice is to use async_setup.

docs-installation-instructions: todo
docs-removal-instructions: todo
entity-event-setup:
status: exempt
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My read is that they are subscribing to events here and do meet this requirement:

self._channel.on_status_update(self._on_update)
-- am i misunderstanding?

comment: |
Entities of this integration does not explicitly subscribe to events.
entity-unique-id: done
has-entity-name: done
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The entities do not appear to set has_entity_name attribute to true. Am I missing it?

Entities of this integration does not explicitly subscribe to events.
entity-unique-id: done
has-entity-name: done
runtime-data: done
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This does not appear to be met as hass.data is still being used rather than runtime_data on the config entry.

config-entry-unloading: done
docs-configuration-parameters: todo
docs-installation-parameters: todo
entity-unavailable: done
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where is this happening?

entity-unavailable: done
integration-owner: done
log-when-unavailable: done
parallel-updates: done
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This integration does not set PARALLEL_UPDATES. This should be todo?

docs-troubleshooting: todo
docs-use-cases: todo
dynamic-devices: done
entity-category: done
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should any of the sensors be diagnostic entity category?

entity-disabled-by-default: done
entity-translations: todo
exception-translations: todo
icon-translations: done
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this is not done yet given the icon translations are not set

stale-devices: done
# Platinum
async-dependency: done
inject-websession: done
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be exempt instead?

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft November 23, 2024 19:33
@home-assistant
Copy link

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants