Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maintainers for hnix in nixpkgs #953

Closed
expipiplus1 opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Maintainers for hnix in nixpkgs #953

expipiplus1 opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@expipiplus1
Copy link
Collaborator

Who is interested in becoming a maintainer for this package in nixpkgs?

It's a case of adding your handle and hnix to the list here: https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/blob/ff9db852f0761e05093abf090d4ecb399fea4324/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/configuration-hackage2nix/main.yaml#L131

Currently it's "transitively maintained" by me for update-nix-fetchgit and @Gabriel439 for dhall.

It's basically a case of fixing any errors which crop up from the haskell package set updates.

@Anton-Latukha
Copy link
Collaborator

Anton-Latukha commented Jun 14, 2021

Well, I largely try to go & submit changes into Nixpkgs, and say that I keep a promise. But frequently someone introduces a patch even before me & as on this Friday - I am guilty of releasing hnix-store-{core,remote} on Thursday & not getting a thought or remorse "would they automatically import into Nixpkgs & align to everything up", & my Friday was busy. Also after peti went away - I & probably many feel lost, I love cdepillabout & maralorn - they are doing rock star work up there, I am happy to meet changes but also it is normal that we feel lost. Please, write to peti farewell letters if someone missed to say goodbye to him, as I did, he would be right to not respond, but in reality - he would be glad to keep them & maybe even print them, a fond memory & a stack of proofs his work was not in vain & meant something.


Also, note to self - for {Core,Remote} still need to evolve haskell-nix/hnix-store#89 to simplify this.


Since Nixpkgs is handled currently - I would add myself everywhere appropriate & go over Nixpkgs, once we release HNix GHC 9.0 support.

I didn't know that haskellPackages have a maintainer field in them.

@sternenseemann
Copy link

I didn't know that haskellPackages have a maintainer field in them.

Unfortunately, this has been undocumented for a long time which we are aiming to change soon, so not knowing about it is to be expected, no worries!

@Anton-Latukha
Copy link
Collaborator

Anton-Latukha commented Jul 8, 2021

I opened a Nixpkgs patch declaring me as a contact/maintainer for {hnix, hnix-store-core, hnix-store-remote}.

@expipiplus1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

expipiplus1 commented Jul 8, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants