SAGE is a precise and highly sensitive somatic SNV, MNV and small INDEL caller. It has dynamically scaling sensitivity based on the depth of the provided tumor and germline BAMs, but performs best if both BAMs have at least 30x typical depth.
Key features include:
- 4 tiered (
HOTSPOT,PANEL,HIGH_CONFIDENCE,LOW_CONFIDENCE) calling allows high sensitivity calling in regions of high prior likelihood including hotspots in low mappability regions such as HIST2H3C K28M - kmer based model which determines a unique read context for the variant + 10 bases of anchoring flanks and rigorously checks for full, partial or incomplete evidence in tumor and normal regardless of local mapping alignment
- Modified quality score incorporates different sources of error (MAPQ, BASEQ, edge distance, improper pair, distance from ref genome, strand bias, failed fragment collapse) without hard cutoffs
- Explicit sample-specific modelling of ‘jitter’ sequencing errors in microsatellite allows improved sensitivity in microsatellites while ignoring common sequencing errors
- No cutoff for homopolymer repeat length for improved INDEL handling
- Phasing of somatic + somatic and somatic + germline variants over whole read length
- Native MNV handling
- Joint calling, including allowing both multiple tumor and reference samples to be analysed concurrently
- Support for diverse calling scenarios including somatic tumor-normal, somatic tumor only, germline, etc.
- An internal alt specific base quality recalibration method
SAGE also supports the ability append additional reference samples to an existing SAGE VCF file. A typical use case would be to analyse previously called variants in RNA or other dditional longitudinal samples for monitoring without having to rerun all samples through SAGE.
In append mode SAGE only performs the alt specific base quality recalibration and normal counts and quality steps. The supplied SAGE VCF is used to determine the candidate variants and no changes are made to tumor counts, filters, phasing, de-duplication or realignment.
To install, download the latest compiled jar file from the download links.
37 and 38 resources are available to download from HMFTools-Resources > DNA Resources.
R is used to generate the base quality recalibration charts, which is done if the config 'write_bqr_plot' is included. Required packages include ggplot2,tidyr and dplyr.
| Argument | Description |
|---|---|
| tumor | Comma separated names of the tumor sample |
| tumor_bam | Comma separated paths to indexed tumor BAM file |
| output_vcf | Name of the output VCF |
| ref_genome | Path to reference genome fasta file |
| ref_genome_version | One of 37 or 38 |
| hotspots | Path to hotspots vcf |
| panel_bed | Path to panel bed |
| high_confidence_bed | Path to high confidence bed |
| ensembl_data_dir | Path to Ensembl data cache |
The cardinality of tumor must match tumor_bam. At least one tumor must be supplied.
| Argument | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
| reference | NA | Comma separated names of the reference sample |
| reference_bam | NA | Comma separated paths to indexed reference BAM file |
| germline | NA | Flag is required to run in germline mode, impacts variant filtering |
| ref_sample_count | 1 | Controls the set of ref samples used for tumor-normal soft-filtering. Zero means none will be used.) |
| resource_dir | None | Path to all resource files, in which case specify the file names only for ref_genome, hotspots, panel_bed and high_confidence_bed |
| threads | 2 | Number of threads to use |
| max_read_depth | 1000 | Maximum number of reads to look for evidence of any HIGH_CONFIDENCE or LOW_CONFIDENCE variant. Reads in excess of this are ignored. |
| max_read_depth_panel | 100,000 | Maximum number of reads to look for evidence of any HOTSPOT or PANEL variant. Reads in excess of this are ignored. |
| min_map_quality | 10 | Min mapping quality to apply to non-hotspot variants |
| min_avg_base_qual | 25 | Min average base quality hard filter. Hotspots default is 18 (config: min_avg_base_qual_hotspot). |
| coverage_bed | NA | Write file with counts of depth of each base of the supplied bed file |
| validation_stringency | STRICT | SAM validation strategy: STRICT, SILENT, LENIENT |
| include_mt | NA | By default the mitochondrial DNA is not read but will be if this config is included |
| no_fragment_sync | False | Where R1 and R2 in a fragment overlap, consider both observations' base and qual as separate pieces of evidence |
| high_depth_mode | False | To be used in targeted sequencing - places additional conditions on read-supporting variants to increase precision |
| read_length | Inferred from BAM | Max read length, affects memory usage slightly and some filtering |
| germline | false | Is a germline run, so tumor/normal filters are not applied |
| jitter_param_dir | BAM path | Path to jitter files (jitter_params.tsv and ms_table.tsv.gz) from Redux |
| skip_msi_jitter | NA | Use default MSI jitter params instead of sample-specific values from Redux files |
| read_context_flank_size | 10 | Number of flanking bases on each side of read core |
The cardinality of reference must match reference_bam.
The following arguments control the alt specific base quality recalibration logic.
| Argument | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
| bqr_disable | false | Disable base quality recalibration |
| bqr_load | false | Reload previously generated BQR files to avoid re-running this stage, or if running on a sliced BAM |
| bqr_write_plot | false | Generate base-quality recalibration plots (requires R) |
| bqr_sample_size | 2,000,000 | Sample size of each autosome |
| bqr_min_map_qual | 50 | Min mapping quality of bam record |
| bqr_write_positions | false | Write positional data as contributes to BQR |
| bqr_write_reads | false | Write detailed read data as contributes to BQR |
| bqr_full_bam | false | Run BQR over full BAM |
| bqr_use_panel | false | Run BQR over panel only |
| bqr_exclude_known | false | In append mode, exclude known variants |
The following arguments are used to calculate the modified tumor quality score
| Argument | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
| base_qual_fixed_penalty | 12 | Fixed penalty to apply to base quality |
| fixed_qual_penalty | 0 | Fixed penalty to apply to map quality |
| improper_pair_qual_penalty | 15 | Penalty to apply to map qual when SAM record does not have the ProperPair flag |
| read_events_qual_penalty | 7 | Penalty to apply to map qual for additional events in read, and per 12 bases of soft clipping |
| Argument | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
| threads | 1 | Number of threads to use |
| log_level | INFO | Also DEBUG and TRACE |
| specific_chr | None | Limit Sage to list of chromosomes, separated by ';' |
| specific_regions | None | Limit Sage to list of regions, separated by ';' in the form chromosome:positionStart-positionEnd |
| perf_warn_time | None | Log a warning if any region (ie 100K partition by default) takes more than X seconds to complete |
| log_evidence_reads | False | For each variant, print a line with each read's match type and various intermediate calculations |
Minimum set of arguments (running in tumor only mode):
java -Xmx32G -jar sage.jar \
-tumor COLO829v003T \
-tumor_bam /sample_data/COLO829v003T.bam \
-ref_genome_version 37 \
-ref_genome /ref_data/refGenome.fasta \
-hotspots /ref_data/KnownHotspots.37.vcf.gz \
-panel_bed /ref_data/ActionableCodingPanel.37.bed.gz \
-high_confidence_bed /ref_data/NA12878_GIAB_highconf_IllFB-IllGATKHC-CG-Ion-Solid_ALLCHROM_v3.2.2_highconf.bed \
-ensembl_data_dir /path_to_ensembl_cache/ \
-output_vcf /sample_data/COLO829v003.sage.vcf.gz \
-threads 16 \
Typical arguments running in paired tumor-normal mode:
java -Xmx32G -jar sage.jar \
-reference COLO829v003R -reference_bam /sample_data/COLO829v003R.bam \
-tumor COLO829v003T -tumor_bam /sample_data/COLO829v003T.bam \
-ref_genome_version 37 \
-ref_genome /ref_data/refGenome.fasta \
-hotspots /ref_data/KnownHotspots.37.vcf.gz \
-panel_bed /ref_data/ActionableCodingPanel.37.bed.gz \
-high_confidence_bed /ref_data/NA12878_GIAB_highconf_IllFB-IllGATKHC-CG-Ion-Solid_ALLCHROM_v3.2.2_highconf.bed \
-ensembl_data_dir /path_to_ensembl_cache/ \
-output_vcf /sample_data/COLO829v003.sage.vcf.gz \
-threads 16 \
| Argument | Description |
|---|---|
| reference | Comma separated names of the reference sample |
| reference_bam | Comma separated paths to indexed reference BAM file |
| input_vcf | Name of the existing SAGE 2.4+ VCF |
| output_vcf | Name of the output VCF |
| ref_genome | Path to reference genome fasta file |
The cardinality of reference must match reference_bam and must not already exist in the input VCF.
| Argument | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
| threads | 2 | Number of threads to use |
| specifc_chr | NA | Limit sage to comma separated list of chromosomes |
| max_read_depth | 1000 | Maximum number of reads to look for evidence of any HIGH_CONFIDENCE or LOW_CONFIDENCE variant. Reads in excess of this are ignored. |
| max_read_depth_panel | 100,000 | Maximum number of reads to look for evidence of any HOTSPOT or PANEL variant. Reads in excess of this are ignored. |
| min_map_quality | 10 | Min mapping quality to apply to non-hotspot variants |
| require_gene | false | Restrict processing to variants with gene annotations |
The optional base quality recalibration and quality arguments also apply.
Minimum set of arguments:
java -cp sage.jar com.hartwig.hmftools.sage.append.SageAppendApplication \
-reference COLO829v003RNA \
-reference_bam /sample_data/COLO829v003RNA.bam \
-ref_genome /ref_data/refGenome.fasta \
-input_vcf /sample_data/COLO829v003.sage.vcf.gz
-output_vcf /sample_data/COLO829v003.sage.rna.vcf.gz
Sage can produce interactive HTML visualisations for specific variants of interest, showing the type of support from each overlapping read.
To enable this output, set one or more of the following arguments:
| Argument | Description |
|---|---|
| vis_variants | List of variants for which to generate output, format 'chromosome:position:ref:alt' and separated by ';' |
| vis_pass_only | Generate output for all passing variants |
| vis_max_support_reads | Max reads per type to display, default is 40 |
| vis_output_dir | Output directory for HTML files, defaults to 'vis' if not specified |
A guide to the visualisations is shown below. A link to the HTML file for this variant is available here.
BAM records that are flagged as unmapped, duplicateRead or secondary/supplementary are ignored.
Optional NM tag (edit distance to the reference) is used in the quality calculation where available otherwise it is calculated on the fly. More information about the tag available here.
SAGE is designed to jointly call any number of samples. 1 or more 'tumor' samples must be defined (unless running in append mode - see below) and any number of reference samples (including 0) may be defined:
- A 'tumor' sample in SAGE is defined as a sample in which SAGE will BOTH search for candidates AND collect evidence
- A 'reference' sample is one in which SAGE will collect evidence only (for candidates identified in the tumor samples)
By default the first reference sample is also treated as a 'germline' sample, which is used for calculation of the germline filters. The number of reference samples to be used for germline filtering can be configured by setting the ref_sample_count. Two common alternatives are:
- If no germline filtering is desired set ref_sample_count = 0.
- If the patient has a bone marrow donor and reference samples for both patient and donor are avaialable, then SAGE can subtract germline calls from both by setting ref_sample_count = 2.
Additionally, SAGE can be run in a germline mode by setting the germline sample to be the 'tumor'. Please see more details here.
In pre-4.0 versions of Sage, variant tumor quality (QUAL) was a sum of per-read final qualities, which were a function of both base and mapping quality. The minTumorQual filter was a simple comparison between this tumor quality and a per-tier threshold. In Sage 4.0+, variant quality is now split into two:
- Base quality, which is a probabilistic measure based on DP, AD and per-read base qual. This is recorded in
TQP, and the phred score of this (capped at 200) is placed in theQUALfield. As before, Sage has per-tier thresholds for this, below which a variant will be marked asminTumorQual - Map quality, which is a heuristic aggregated from all reads contributing to DP. This is recorded in
MQFand is not encoded in theQUALfield, but can still cause a variant to beminTumorQualfiltered based on separate per-tier thresholds.
Both sets of per-tier thresholds are specified in the 'Soft Filters' section of the readme.
The read context of a variant is the region surrounding it in the read where it was found. It must be sufficiently large to uniquely identify the variant from both the reference and other possible variants at that location regardless of local alignment. SAGE uses the read context to search for evidence supporting the variant and calculate the allelic depth and frequency.
The core read context is a distinct set of bases surrounding a variant after accounting for any microhomology in the read and any repeats in the read. A 'repeat' in this context, is defined as having 1-5 bases repeated at least 3 times. The core is a minimum of 4 bases long. For a SNV/MNV in a non-repeat sequence this will just be the alternate base(s) with 2 bases either side. If either outer base is inside a repeat, we extend the core to fully cover the repeat plus one padding base, eg 'TAAAAAC'. If the padding base is itself part of a long (6+ count) repeat, we extend again in the same way.
A DEL always includes the 2 bases on either side of the deleted sequence. If the delete is part of a microhomology or repeat sequence, this will also be included in the core read context.
An INSERT always includes the 2 base on either side of the inserted sequence as well as the inserted bases themselves. As with a DEL, the core read context will be extended to include any repeats and/or microhomology.
The complete read context is the core read context flanked on either side by an additional 10 bases. Notably, reads can have high quality errors in flank bases and still count towards AD, but not for core bases.
The following example illustrate how we construct and use a read context for a simple T > A SNV.
The read context core is the variant itself expanded to cover at least 5 bases. Typically we use 10 bases for the flank, but for this illustration we then use an additional 5 bases on either side to get the complete read context.
Reference: ...ACCATGGATACCATCATAACATACGA... Variant: A Core read context: CAACA Flanked read context: GATACCAACATAACA
In the following table we match the read context against BAM reads in numerous ways. In descending order of quality:
- A
FULLmatch includes at least one full flank - A
PARTIAL_COREmatch is missing one flank and some 'nonessential' core bases but matches what is remaining - A
REALIGNEDmatch has the same requirements as a FULL/PARTIAL_CORE match, but is offset - A
COREmatch has error(s) within flank bases. - A 'simple alt' match agrees only on the variant base(s), and has error(s) elsewhere in the core
'Simple alt' matches do not contribute to AD. All others do, but CORE matches do not contribute to the QUAL score.
Reference: ...ACCATGGATACCATCATAACATACGA... Variant: A Core context: CAACA Read context: GATACCAACATAACA Full Match: ...ACCATGGATACCAACATAACATACGA... Partial Match: AACATAACATACGA... Core Match: ...ACCATGGACACCAACATAACATAACATACGA... Realigned Match: ...ACCCATGGATACCAACATAACATACG... Simple Alt Match: ...ACCATGGATACCGAGATAACATACGA...
If the read matches the ref sequence (instead of the read context) to at least CORE standard, the read is considered to support ref.
Reference: ...ACCATGGATACCATCATAACATACGA... Variant: A Core context: CAACA Read context: GATACCAACATAACA No Match: ...ACCATGGATACCTCCATAACATACGA... No Match: ...ACCATGGATACCACTATAACATACGA... No Match: ...ACCATGGATACCTTCATAACATACGA... Ref Match: ...ACCATGGATACCATCATAACATACGA...
The importance of capturing the microhomology is demonstrated in the following example. This delete of 4 bases in a AAAC microhomology is nominally left aligned as 7: AAAAC > A but can equally be represented as 8:AAACA > A, 9:AACAA > A, 10: ACAAA > A, 11: CAAAC > C etc.
Using a (bolded) read context of CAAAAACAAACAAACAAT spanning the microhomology matches every alt but not the ref:
REF: GTCTCAAAAACAAACAAACAAACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAA AAACAAACAAACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAA AACAAACAAACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAA ACAAACAAACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAA CAAACAAACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAAC AAACAAACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAACA AACAAACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAACAA ACAAACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAACAAA CAAACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAACAAAC AAACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAACAAACA AACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAACAAACAA ACAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAACAAACAAA CAATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAACAAACAAAC AATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAACAAACAAACA ATAAAAAAC ALT: GTCTCAAAAACAAACAAACAA TAAAAAAC
A similar principle applies to any repeat sequences. Spanning them in the read context permits matching with alternate alignments.
There are 9 key steps in the SAGE algorithm described in detail below:
- Alt Specific Base Quality Recalibration
- Candidate Variants
- Tumor Counts and Quality
- Normal Counts and Quality
- Soft Filter
- Phasing
- De-duplication
- Gene Panel Coverage
SAGE includes a base quality recalibration method to adjust sequencer reported base qualities to empirically observed values since we observe that qualities for certain base contexts and alts can be systematically over or under estimated which can cause either false positives or poor sensitivity respectively. This idea is inspired by the GATK BQSR tool, but instead of using a covariate model we create a direct lookup table for base quality adjustments. The recalibration is unique per sample.
The empirical base quality is measured in each reference and tumor sample for each {trinucleotide context, alt, sequencer reported base qual, consensus type} combination and an adjustment is calculated. This is performed by sampling a 2M base window from each autosome and counting the number of mismatches per {trinucleotide context, alt, sequencer reported base qual}.
Fragments with low mapping quality (by default: below 50) are ignored as errors can be plausibly explained as mapping errors rather than base quality errors. Similarly, sites that may harbour a genuine germline or somatic variant rather than errors are excluded from contribution. This is determined as follows:
- Across
DUALfragments (i.e. duplex consensus): exclude site ifaltVaf >= 0.01 && (altVaf >= 0.05 || altCount > 2) - Across other fragments (i.e. non-duplex or singleton): exclude site if
altVaf >= 0.075 && (altVaf >= 0.125 || altCount > 3)
Note that the definition of this recalibrated base quality is slightly different to the sequencer base quality, since it is the probability of making a specific ALT error given a trinucleotide sequence, whereas the sequencer base quality is the probability of making any error at the base in question. Since the chance of making an error to a specific base is lower than the chance of making it to a random base, the ALT specific base quality will generally be higher even if the sequencer base quality matches the empirical distribution.
For all SNV and MNV calls the base quality is adjusted to the empirically observed value before determining the quality. SAGE produces both a file output and QC chart which show the magnitude of the base quality adjustment applied for each {trinucleotide context, alt, sequencer reported base qual, consensus type} combination. These files are written into the same directory as the output file.
A typical example of the chart (for one consensus type) is shown below. Note that each bar represents the amount that will be added to the sequencer Phred score:
Base quality recalibration is enabled by default but can be disabled by supplying including the-bqr_disable argument.
The base quality recalibration chart is generated with the config -bqr_write_plot.
In this first pass of the tumor BAM(s), SAGE looks for candidate variants using reads with adjusted MAPQ >=1 (penalising the mapping quality for NM and softclips in accordance with read_events_qual_penalty)
Valid candidates must include a complete read context, with full-length flanks.
INDELS are located using the I and D flag in the CIGAR.
SNVs and MNVs are located by comparing the bases in every aligned region (flags M, X or =) with the provided reference genome.
MNVs consist of up to 3 bases, with 2 SNVs split by 1 reference base also treated as a 3 base MNV. ie, MNVs with CIGARs 1X1M1X and 3X are both considered valid MNVs of length 3.
Longer insertions or duplications may be aligned by BWA as a soft clipping instead of as an insertion in the bam file. To ensure these insertions are captured, SAGE also searches for candidates in soft clipping by taking the first 12 bases of the reference genome at the location of the soft clip and testing for an exact match in the soft clip sequence at least 5 bases from the soft clip site (implying an insertion of at least 5 bases). If such an insert is found, Sage will then left-align the implied variant as necessary.
For each candidate, SAGE tallies the ref/alt support and total quality and selects the most frequently found read context of each variant. As each variant can potentially have multiple read contexts due to sequencing errors or sub-clonal populations, SAGE also allows additional read contexts as candidates IF there are at least max(25% max support,3) reads with FULL support for that read context. Multiple read contexts may be possible for example where a germline HET SNV overlaps read context with a germline HOM SNV or when a somatic subclonal SNV overlaps read context with a somatic clonal SNV.
A candidate will be dropped at this stage if it is only identified on one fragment.
If multiple tumors are supplied, the final set of candidates is the superset of all individual tumor candidates that satisfy the hard filter criteria.
The aim of the stage it to collect evidence of each candidate variant's read context in the tumor.
SAGE examines every read with MAPQ >=1 (penalising the mapping quality for NM and softclips in accordance with read_events_qual_penalty) overlapping the variant tallying matches of the read context.
A match can be (in descending order of quality):
FULL- Read context matches read at same reference location. At least one flank must be fully coveredPARTIAL_CORE- Read context matches read at same reference location. All 'essential' core bases are covered. An 'N' cigar (representating a splice junction gap in RNA) is considered to truncate the coreREALIGNED- AFULL/PARTIAL_COREstandard of match, but offset from the expected positionCORE- Core matches read but either flank doesn't- Simple alt (tracked under
SAC) - Read context matches read on the variant base(s), and has error(s) elsewhere in the core
Other relevant details are:
- Errors are tolerated in flanks so long as raw base qual at mismatch base < 20
- If more than 3 such flank errors exist, we downgrade the match standard to
CORE - One low quality core error is tolerated per 8 bases of core length, after stripping repeats out of the core
- The 'essential' core bases include the variant base(s) (for an SNV/MNV) or the bases collectively spanning all the repeats in the core, with 1 base padding (for an indel)
- Some core bases are not allowed to have an error:
- For an SNV/MNV, these are again the variant base(s)
- For an indel, these are the first bases that differ between ref and alt, the last base of homology and first non-homologous base, looking both left->right and right->left through the read
By default, if the positive and negative stranded reads of a fragment overlap, a consensus of the overlap is taken, and the 2 reads in the fragment converted into a single consensus read. For each base, if the R1 and R2 observations agree, set the consensus base qual to the high base qual from either read. If there is disagreement, the nucleotide with the highest base qual is chosen and the quality is set to the difference in base quals. However, if -no_sync_fragments=True then each read is processed individually in this instance.
Failing a match of CORE or better, SAGE searches for matches that would occur if a repeat in the complete read context was extended or retracted. Matches of this type we call 'jitter' and are tallied as LENGTHENED or SHORTENED.
If the variant is not found and instead matches the ref genome at that location with at least CORE quality, the REFERENCE tally is incremented.
Any read which spans 'essential' read core bases increments the TOTAL tally.
Sage takes parameter files from Redux (of the form SAMPLE.jitter_params.tsv and SAMPLE.ms_table.tsv.gz for all tumor and reference samples) to set an appropriate base quality for microsatellite indels. Specifically, a 6-parameter model provides for an asymmetric laplace distribution to model all permutations of (repeat count, repeat unit). We then use the longest read core repeat, ref and alt bases to determine a modelled error rate for the error in question. This is backed out into a phred score, and acts as a cap for per-read base qual contribution for that variant. For example, if a 8xT>9xT expansion is modelled with a 0.01 error rate, the per-read base qual would be capped at -10 * log10(0.01) = 20.
This approach is only applied for repeats of length 4 or more, and indels of no more than 5 repeat units. Additionally, we fall back to typical 'default jitter' parameterisation if the rate of sample-specific jitter is very high (for example, in a MSI sample)
If a FULL, PARTIAL_CORE or REALIGNED match is made, we update the quality of the variant.
No other match contributes to quality.
There are a number of constraints to penalise the quality:
- as the variant approaches the edge of a read,
- if the read encompasses more than one variant, or
- the read is softclipped, or
- if the ProperPair flag (0x02) is not set
To do this we first calculate a modified base quality as follows:
distanceFromReadEdge = minimum distance from the edge of the 'essential' core bases to the edge of the read edgeDistancePenalty = 15 if distanceFromReadEdge == 0, else 5 if distanceFromReadEdge == 1, else 0 baseQuality (SNV/MNV) = BASEQ at variant location (min qual across variant bases for MNV) baseQuality (Indel) = average BASEQ over core read context modifiedBaseQuality = baseQuality - `baseQualityFixedPenalty (12)` - edgeDistancePenalty
If the variant is a microsatellite indel, then baseQuality is capped by the phred score associated with the modelled error rate, as described above. Additionally, baseQualityFixedPenalty is not applied.
We also modify the map quality taking into account the number of events, soft clipping and improper pair annotation:
readEvents = NM tag from BAM record adjusted so that INDELs and (candidate) MNVs count as only 1 event distanceFromReferencePenalty = (readEvents - 1) * `map_qual_read_events_penalty (7)`^ softClipPenalty = if(hasSoftClip,(max(1,soft clip bases /12),0) * `map_qual_read_events_penalty (7)`^ improperPairPenalty = `mapQualityImproperPairPenalty (15)` if proper pair flag not set else 0 modifiedMapQuality^ = MAPQ - `mapQualityFixedPenalty (0)` - improperPairPenalty - distanceFromReferencePenalty - softClipPenalty
^ note that for the 6 highly polymorphic HLA genes (HLA-A,HLA-B,HLA-C,HLA-DQA1,HLA-DQB1,HLA-DQR1) we instead use modified MAPQ = min (10, MAPQ - mapQualityFixedPenalty). We intend to improve this at some later stage by making the caller HLA type aware.
We then take the minimum of the 2 modified qualities as the read contribution to the total quality:
totalQuality += max(0, min(modifiedMapQuality, modifiedBaseQuality))
To reduce processing the following hard filters are applied:
| Filter | Default Value | Field |
|---|---|---|
| hard_min_tumor_qual | 50 | totalQuality |
| hard_min_tumor_vaf | 0.002 | AF |
| hard_min_tumor_raw_alt_support | 2 | AD[1] |
| jitter p-score | 0.05 | see description of jitter p-score below |
| filtered_max_germline_alt_support | 3 | Normal AD[1] |
Note that hotspots are never hard-filtered.
Variants failing any of the first 4 filters are excluded from this point onwards and have no further processing applied to them. The filtered_max_normal_alt_support is applied at the final step of the algorithm, solely to reduce file size, and is not applied in the absence of a provided reference sample. The filtered_max_normal_alt_support does not apply to germline variants in the same local phase set as passing somatic variants.
After aggregating read support counts, as well as LENGTHENED and SHORTENED jitter counts in the previous step, we now determine if the variant should be discarded as likely jitter noise from an alternative allele.
Specifically:
- If
LENGTHENED>FULL, we consider the modelled error rate of seeing the repeat count associated withFULLfrom a true repeat count associated withLENGTHENED. If the 'actual' jitter rate is less than 2x the modelled error rate, or the p-score of the 'actual' jitter rate is too high, we mark the variant to be filtered:- If the p-score > 0.05, the variant will be hard filtered (or soft filtered if a hotspot)
- Otherwise if the variant is > 0.00025 (or the actual jitter rate is <2x the modelled error rate) we mark the variant for later soft filtering
- We apply the same process as above, but for
SHORTENEDinstead ofLENGTHENED - If min(
LENGTHENED,SHORTENED) >FULL, we also consider the possibility that theFULLreads came in part from both theLENGTHENEDandSHORTENEDallele. Thus, we combine theLENGTHENEDandSHORTENEDcounts, take the mean of their modelled error rates, and apply the same tests as above
Notes:
- All error rates used in the above calculations are floored at 1e-4, including an error rate for any repeat count < 4
- We floor the modelled error rate at 0.04 for PANEL/HOTSPOT variants with a trinucleotide repeat in the core that aren’t themselves a non-trinucleotide indel. This is to model the predisposition towards trinucleotide indels in coding regions (since they do not cause a frameshift)
Evidence of each candidate variant is collected in all of the supplied reference bams in the same manner as step 3.
The only exception is that for inserts of >10 bases, we run a supplementary matching routine specifically for germline evidence: if the number of matching bases post-variant index against the read context is >=2 more than against ref, we allow the read to provide PARTIAL_CORE support. This makes us more robust to finding approximate germline evidence for a long and complex insert.
RNA bams are valid reference sources.
Given evidence of the variants in the tumor and normal we apply somatic filters. The key principles behind the filters are ensuring sufficient support for the variant (minimum VAF and score) in the tumor sample and validating that the variant is highly unlikely to be present in the normal sample.
The filters are tiered to maximise sensitivity in regions of high prior likelihood for variants.
A hotspot panel of 10,000 specific variants are set to the highest sensitivity (TIER=HOTSPOT) followed by medium sensitivity for exonic and splice regions for the canonical transcripts of a panel of cancer related genes (TIER =PANEL) and more aggressive filtering genome wide in both high confidence (TIER=HIGH_CONFIDENCE) and low confidence (TIER=LOW_CONFIDENCE) regions to ensure a low false positive rate genome wide. These tiers can be customised by providing alternative bed files as configuration.
Note: Variants can get min_tumor_qual filtered due to having either insufficient base or map quality. The QUAL field in the VCF only refers to the base quality of the variant, and is equal to the phred score of TQP, capped at 200. The MQF annotation specifies the map quality of the variant.
The specific filters and default settings for each tier are:
| Filter | Hotspot | Panel | High Confidence | Low Confidence | Field |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| min_tumor_qual1 | 202 | 50 | 80 | 140 | Phred score of TQP, i.e. QUAL |
| min_tumor_qual7 | -6 | -6 | 0 | 0 | MQF |
| min_tumor_vaf5 | 1.0% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 2.5% | AF |
| min_germline_depth | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | Normal RC_CNT[6] |
| min_germline_depth_allosome | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | Normal RC_CNT[6] |
| max_germline_vaf3 | 10% | 4% | 4% | 4% | NormalRC_CNT[0+1+2+3+4] / RC_CNT[6] |
| max_germline_rel_raw_base_qual | 25% | 4% | 4% | 4% | Normal RABQ[1] / Tumor RABQ[1] |
| max_map_qual_ref_alt_difference | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | Derived from AMQ |
| maxEdgeDistance6 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | Derived from MED and AD |
| fragmentStrandBias | 0.0 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | SBLikelihood4 |
| readStrandBias | 0.0 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | RSBLikelihood4 |
| minAvgBaseQualf8 | 18 | 25 | 25 | 25 | ABQ |
| minFragmentCoords8 | AD>4: 3 AD>2: 2 |
AD>4: 3 AD>2: 2 |
AD>4: 3 AD>2: 2 |
AD>4: 3 AD>2: 2 |
Num distinct start/end fragment coordinates |
| minStrongSupport | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | RC_CNT[0+1+3] |
| altFragmentLength | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | p-score of alt fragment length |
| maxRealignedPercentage | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | RC_CNT[3] / RC_CNT[0+1+2+3] |
| jitter | 0.00025 | 0.00025 | 0.00025 | 0.00025 | p-score of FULL, SHORTENED and LENGTHENED |
-
The
TQPis a p-score representing the chance of randomly observing the number of qual-supporting reads we did, at the quality we did. -
Even if tumor qual score cutoff is not met, hotspots are also called so long as tumor vaf >= 0.08 and allelic depth in tumor supporting the ALT >= 8 reads and tumorRawBQ1 > 150. This allows calling of pathogenic hotspots even in known poor mappability regions, eg. HIST2H3C K28M.
-
special filter (max_germline_alt_support) is applied for MNV and INS of > 10 bases such that it is filtered if 1% or more of the reads in the germline contains evidence of the variant.
-
Likelihood =
binomial(min(SB,1-SB)*AD,AD,0.5,TRUE)If 0.15<SB<0.85 or if ref is sufficiently biased, we never filter. -
Even if tumor VAF threshold is not met, we can still call a variant if p-score likelihood < 10-14 (10-9 in hotspots), considering the ref and alt average recalibrated base qual.
-
If
MED> 33% of read length (20% forHOTSPOT/PANEL) or variant is 10+ base insert, we never filter -
MQFis an overall site-wide map qual factor, evaulated as:AMMQ - 25 - 2*max(AMQ[ALL]-AMQ[ALT], 0) - phred(pscore(readStrandBias)) - phred(pscore(AED)) - repeatPenalty, whererepeatPenaltyis 3 per repeat count if the core contains a non-homopolymer repeat of at least 15 bases. -
Not applied for indels using the modelled microsatellite error rate
If multiple tumors are supplied, a variant remains unfiltered if it is unfiltered for any single tumor. The germline criteria are only evaluated against the primary reference, ie, the first in the supplied reference list. If no reference bams supplied, the germline criteria are not evaluated.
Soft filters can be disabled using the disable_soft_filter parameter.
Soft filters become hard filters when the hard_filter flag is included.
Patients who have previously undergone bone marrow transplantation may have a significant proportion of donor DNA in the blood and impurities tumor biopsy both. In such cases, we may want to treat multiple reference samples (ie patient + donor samples) as germline references for subtraction in Sage. Sage now includes an optional parameter (germlineSampleCount {0->N}). If not set, then Sage will assume that the first reference sample is a germline sample, otherwise the first N samples will be treated as germline samples and germline filters will be applied. If germlineSampleCount = 0, then germline filters are not applied and reference samples are annotated only.
For targeted sequencing, the high_depth_mode flag should be provided. This allows Sage to make high-quality variant calls at low VAFs in high depth samples by adding the following additional conditions:
- Reads that have discordant or unmapped mates are ignored
- Reads with raw base qual < 30 do not provide variant support
SAGE tries to phase variants which have overlapping read evidence. Phasing is considered for any variants not filtered by the ‘hard_min_tumor_qual’, ’hard_min_tumor_raw_alt_support’ or ‘hard_min_tumor_raw_base_quality’ hard filters or by the ‘min_tumor_vaf’ soft filter.
The variants are into ‘phase regions’ (ie regions without any read overlap, and hence can be phased independently). If a phase region has no PASS variants, then skip phasing. For each phase region the following operations are performed:
- Create ‘sets’ - Sets are groups of reads that overlap identical candidate variants with the same phase support (either + for alt support or - for reference support). For example, one set would be all the reads that support +A+B where A and B are 2 candidate variants)
- Collapse sets - Collapse sets which are proper subsets of other sets into their supersets, eg. ‘+A+B’ but do NOT also cover variant C may be collapsed into the superset ‘+A+B+C’. 1 set may be collapsible into multiple supersets (eg. +A+B may be collapsable into +A+B+C and +A+B-C if both have independent support. In this case the read counts are pro-rata added to the supersets
- Iteratively merge overlapping sets - merge any pairs of overlapping sets, if at least in one direction there exists only 1 option with consistent overlap. .Repeat until no further sets can be merged
- Filter uninformative sets - ie sets that contain no positive phasing combinations that do not already exist in another consistent set.
- Filter sets with identical PASS variants - Retain only sets with maximum read count support.
- Filter sets with subsets of PASS variants - Filter any subsets of PASS variants with <25% read support of a superset of PASS variants
Each variant is annotated on the basis of this algorithm with one or more LPS. The support is also annotated for each phase set as LPS_RC. Downstream analyses such as PAVE and Neo which utilise LPS may use either the most supported LPS or consider all LPS.
Note that phasing is only done on the first tumor sample. Any filtered variant that shares a local phase set with a PASS variant after all filters are applied is retained in the file and not hard filtered to allow phased neo-epitopes and functional impact to be assessed downstream.
Note also that to increase performance for complex regions with high numbers of candidate sets a threshold is applied to the number of reads support each set:
readCountThreshold = max(log10(localSetCount) - 2),1)
Sets with less than the read count threshold are dropped before merging and collapsing.
De-duplication removes any duplicate candidate variants, which may represent the same underlying mutation in different ways. SAGE removes the following 4 types of deduplication in the following order on PASS variants only:
- dedupMNV - DEDUP any overlapping MNV in the same phase set. MNV may have 2 or 3 bases. First any MNV which has 2 changed bases and overlaps with an MNV with 3 changed bases is filtered. If both have 2 changed bases then the least compact MNV is filtered. If both have the same number of bases and changed bases then the lowest qual MNV is filtered.
- dedupMixedGermlineSomatic - Filter MNVs as DEDUP which can be explained by a germline filtered SNV and PASS, except when the MNV is in a coding region and impacts more than one base of the same codon impacted by the SNV. Any MNVs that have a germline component and all associated SNVs (including somatic) are given a shared MSG (mixed somatic germline) identifier.
- dedupMNVSNV - Any remaining passing SNVs that are phased with and contribute to a passing somatic MNV are filtered as DEDUP.
- dedupINDEL - Consider a list of variants with at least some phase set overlap, and containing at least one INDEL. Rank all INDELs with a heuristic, and starting from the strongest supported INDEL, check if the variant's full read context can be made by injecting the variant into the reference sequence (potentially including other variants). If so, throw away all unused variants in the list with either
MED< 33% of read length (20% forPANEL/HOTSPOT) or whose POS and core end live between the INDEL's full RC.
After deduplication any uninformative or duplicate phase sets are further removed.
If there are any cases where the exact same variant is still duplicated (ie. same chromosome, position,ref,alt) but with different read core contexts, then the lower quality variant is hard filtered with the LPS information merged.
To provide confidence that there is sufficient depth in the gene panel a count of depth of each base in the gene panel is calculated and written to file for each tumor sample. Note that only reads with MapQ > 10 are included in the coverage calculations.
The file shows the number of bases with 0 to 30 reads and then buckets reads in intervals of 10 up to 100+.
For a sample with approximately 30x depth this may appear as:
gene 0 1 2 ... 27 28 29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-99 100+
BRCA1 0 0 0 ... 23 54 116 1854 2834 875 5 0 0 0 0
ERBB2 0 0 0 ... 106 154 203 2315 832 83 0 0 0 0 0
TP53 0 0 0 ... 31 41 59 636 192 35 0 0 0 0 0
While a 100x depth sample might appear something more like:
gene 0 1 2 ... 27 28 29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-99 100+
BRCA1 0 0 0 ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 390 1700 3672
ERBB2 0 0 0 ... 0 0 0 0 0 18 257 590 1311 1111 611
TP53 0 0 0 ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 423 343 376
A 'missed variant likelihood' is calculated using poisson as the mean probability of not finding at least 3 reads coverage for an allele given the depth distribution over the whole gene.
The outputs below are found in the VCF::
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
RC_CNT[0,1,2,3,4,5] |
Read Context Count [FULL, PARTIAL_CORE, CORE, REALIGNED, REFERENCE, TOTAL] |
RC_QUAL[0,1,2,3,4,5] |
Read Context Quality [FULL, PARTIAL, CORE, REALIGNED,REFERENCE, TOTAL] |
RC_JIT[0,1] |
Read Context Jitter [SHORTENED, LENGTHENED] |
RC_IPC |
Read Context improper pair count |
AD[0,1] |
Allelic Depth (=[RC_CNT[5], RC_CNT[0] + RC_CNT[1] + RC_CNT[2] + RC_CNT[3] + RC_CNT[4]] ) |
DP |
Read Depth (=RC_CNT[6]) |
TQP |
p-score associated with variant given DP, AD and base quality |
MQF |
Mapping quality factor |
AF |
Allelic Frequency (=AD[1] / DP) |
QUAL |
Variant Quality (=RC_QUAL[0] + RC_QUAL[1] - RC_JIT[2]) |
AMQ[0,1] |
Average (raw) Mapping Quality (all, alt) |
AMMQ |
Average modified mapping quality |
AMBQ |
Average modified base quality |
ABQ[0,1] |
Average recalibrated base quality (all, alt) |
MED |
Max read edge distance for alt-supporting reads |
AED |
Average read edge distance (all, alt) |
RSB[0,1] |
Proportion of alt-supporting reads on the forward strand |
SB[0,1] |
Proportion of alt-supporting fragments with F1R2 orientation |
SAC |
Simple alt count (not considered to be AD) |
RC_INFO |
Read context info: RCAlignmentStart-RCVariantIndex-LeftFlank-Core-RightFlank-RCCigar |
RC_REPC |
Longest repeat count identified in read core |
RC_REPS |
Repeating unit associated with RC_REPC |
RC_MH |
Microhomology in read context |
Time taken for Sage to run is proportional to the size of the BAM file and the number of threads used. Memory increases with number of threads. Each chromosome is partitioned into blocks of 100K bases for each stage of processing.
Performance numbers were taken from a 24 core machine using paired normal tumor COLO829 data with an average read depth of 35 and 93 in the normal and tumor respectively.
- elapsed time = 46 minutes
- peak memory = 7GB
Variant calling Improvements
- MNV calling near qual cutoffs - Occasionally 2 variants may individually PASS but the combined MNV may fail filters. Impact is very limited since we will phase anyway. An example is COLO829v003T 13:5559855 TCA>CAT (which narrowly fails qual filtering but the component SNVs PASS).
- Support for ALT contigs - For now we only support chromosomes 1-22, X,Y, and optionally MT
- Hard filter settings - These should potentially be set much higher for FFPE samples to improve performance and reduce memory and file size. SAGE would ideally detect this internally and dynamically set the optimal filter.
- Optionally rescue based on RNA reference sample support - If RNA is run, we should have the option of rescuing variants from minTumorQual support failure using qual from RNA.
- Read position diversity - Similar to ignoring duplicates we could limit the maximum qual support from reads with the same base position. We see some FFPE panel samples where this could help
- Filtering of supplementary reads - This is necessary to remove artefacts, but may lead to reduced sensitivity particularly for long deletions which may be mapped with a supplementary read
- Event penalty - We currently have an event penalty which reduces MAPQ by 7 for every ‘event’ in a read. This means we have reduced sensitivity for highly clustered variants and no sensitivity where there are more than 6 events in a 150 base window. The penalty on soft clips also decreases sensitivity near genuine SV.
- Complex events in key cancer genes - Any messy read profile is likely to be something interesting if it falls within a well known cancer gene. We should make sure not to miss any of these
- BQR based on read position - some library preparations have strong positional biases. Adjusting for this would reduce FP.
- BQR at long palindromic sequences - some library preparations frequently have errors in palindromic regions. Adjusting for this would reduce FP.
- Low MAPQ - Sage penalises low MAPQ reads harshly. No truth set is available in these regions, so it is unclear whether this behaviour is the correct decision.
- SNV base qual downstream of long homopolymer with insert - If a sample has a germline extension of a long homopolymer, a somatic SNV immediately downstream of the homopolymer that extends it will have different QUAL characteristics for forward and reverse stranded reads, due to the left-alignment convention for indels. Specifically, the negative strand should use a different base for variant qual.
- Better MNV handling - we don't consider that multiple high quality SNVs in a row may imply multiple adjacent sequencing or upstream errors in our QUAL model, and so have scope to be more sensitive here
- Adding strand context to BQR - Recalibration accuracy could be improved if we combined reverse complemented contexts into one, and had separate recalibrated quals for forward and reverse strand to reflect different sequencing idiosyncracies
- Improve readEvents calculation for synced fragments - we normally transform a read's raw NM by applying only 1 edit count per INDEL element and ignoring the edit count for the variant itself, when applying event penalty. However, doing this with synced fragments (which use the first read's NM attribute but a 'superset' CIGAR) can result in unexpected behaviour.
- Looking in correct direction for homopolymer in synced fragment - we suppress calling specific known NovaSeqX artefacts by looking for long homopolymers upstream of a candidate variant. For synced fragments, we will sometimes look the wrong way and so assign the wrong base qual to that read. Most relevant for targeted panel sequencing on NovaSeqX
- Handling germline multi-base inserts in NovaSeqX artefact suppression logic - suppressing artefacts phased with homopolymer inserts of 3 or more bases is not currently supported by the algorithm, and there is a known issue with handling 2 base inserts, causing some artefacts associated with these to PASS as well
- Running indel deduper with germline filtered indel - If an indel is germline filtered but we have a few potential somatic variants that are artefacts of this indel, we want to filter these.
- Fragment sync robustness - an indel in a long repeat can be represented as either a softclip or an indel CIGAR element depending on read start/end coordinates. For some fragments, the two reads can have different representations, and this currently causes fragment sync to fail. We could either be more robust to this circumstance, or use a more nuanced fallback when syncing fails.
- Handling indels outside core for softclip realignment - the realignment routine looks leftward from the right edge of the core to identify the realigned variant read index. Occasionally, there may be a phased indel in a softclipped, alt-supporting read that is outside the variant core (i.e. ignored by the realignment routine) but is encoded in the softclip such that the end core position is offset. This causes realignment core matching to fail.
Phasing improvements
- Only first tumor sample is currently phased - Reference and additional tumor samples are not utilised for phasing
- Fragment based phasing - We can extend phasing even further by looking at the fragment level. Fragments typically extend 400-600 bases. This may be relevant in assessing ASE where coverage is low or for determining whether 2xTSG hits are on the same parental chromosome. Again similar to point 1 we could search for fragments that cover both core regions and look for relative support for neither, both or one or the other variants.
- Population based phasing - we can extend germline phasing even further afield using population based phasing known as imputation with ranges of up to 100kb. This could potentially assist with phasing across exon boundaries and would allow more accurate purity and ploidy fitting.
- Phasing across exon boundaries with WTS data - May be relevant for neo-epitope prediction or functional consequence.
- Confusion of low qual mismatches in long cores - low qual mismatches in long cores are tolerated, but can mean that some incompatible variants may appear phased
- Germline phased variants may not be deduped - SAGE does not dedup filtered variants so this may cause confusion in phasing. This can be an issue around microsatellites.
Other functionality
- scDNA / scRNA - Support counting by single cell labels
- mhDEL sensitivity - Could improve tiered sensitivity to better support HRD
Performance
- High depth regions - Phasing may be slow in very high depth regions