Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

retry parameter in sync REST LRO methods is ignored #723

Open
ohmayr opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

retry parameter in sync REST LRO methods is ignored #723

ohmayr opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@vchudnov-g
Labels
priority: p3 Desirable enhancement or fix. May not be included in next release. type: bug Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.

Comments

@ohmayr
Copy link
Contributor

ohmayr commented Oct 3, 2024

The retry parameter in sync REST LRO methods is unused which means that the configured retryable error codes are ignored. Ensure that the configured retryable error codes are passed down to the auth layer and the request is retried if the response status is one of the configured retryable error codes.
@ohmayr ohmayr mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2024
Merged
@ohmayr ohmayr added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. type: bug Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns. priority: p3 Desirable enhancement or fix. May not be included in next release. and removed type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. labels Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@vchudnov-g vchudnov-g

Labels
priority: p3 Desirable enhancement or fix. May not be included in next release. type: bug Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@vchudnov-g @ohmayr