You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm going through and doing some alignment work and I was curious about the decision-making process behind using max & min as an aggregator vs the high/low + limit as descriptors.
I feel that the description of the subfields for max and min seem to communicate one purpose, whereas the type designated for the subfield communicates a different one.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello everyone!
I'm going through and doing some alignment work and I was curious about the decision-making process behind using max & min as an aggregator vs the high/low + limit as descriptors.
I feel that the description of the subfields for max and min seem to communicate one purpose, whereas the type designated for the subfield communicates a different one.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions