Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we discuss the author's order? #86

Closed
supernord opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed

Should we discuss the author's order? #86

supernord opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 9 comments

Comments

@supernord
Copy link
Collaborator

Should we discuss the author's order?

Originally posted by @bebatut in #79 (comment)

Moving this to a new issue so that I can merge the PR and create a new preview pdf for the paper.

@supernord
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bebatut @paulzierep

@bebatut
Copy link
Member

bebatut commented Mar 20, 2024

Current order:

  • Paul Zierep
  • Bérénice Batut
  • Nicola Soranzo
  • Matúš Kalaš
  • Ove Johan Ragnar Gustafsson
  • Engy Nasr
  • Tunc Kayikcioglu
  • Joseph Wang

It feels more right that @supernord you are not lost in the middle. So either on the first or last position given the work you put in the preprint. Same for @matuskalas
And we could do alphabetical order in the middle

@matuskalas
Copy link
Contributor

I think you @bebatut @paulzierep @supernord absolutely should both discuss and decide this 😊

My suggestion would be that you 3 take the first-author and last-author places, just decide who of you which, gladly with "shared first" or "shared last" authorship. I'm fine with being somewhere in the middle.

Sure this isn't sooo crucial for a preprint, but it still might occassionally matter, and I'd also see it as an exercise for the next, "peer"-reviewed publication.

@matuskalas
Copy link
Contributor

I reckon you @bebatut @paulzierep @supernord also know best how to order the contributors from Freiburg and Australia.

@supernord, was it really only Joseph & you contributing from AU?? I had a feeling you were a big group 😮

@matuskalas
Copy link
Contributor

matuskalas commented Mar 20, 2024

I think you @bebatut @paulzierep @supernord absolutely should both discuss and decide this 😊

But yeah, if you don't have time to discuss or cannot/hesitate to decide, I can give you as apparently the most senioroldest co-author a suggestion 😉😋

@supernord
Copy link
Collaborator Author

supernord commented Mar 20, 2024

I'm happy to be last author.

@supernord, was it really only Joseph & you contributing from AU?? I had a feeling you were a big group 😮

I don't think we have overlooked anyone. We were a big group, but we were also working across a few projects at once.
I'm checking again now, just to be sure.

@supernord
Copy link
Collaborator Author

#87

@bebatut
Copy link
Member

bebatut commented Mar 21, 2024

What about then @paulzierep and me as first authors, @supernord as last, and everyone in the middle in alphabetical order?

@paulzierep
Copy link
Collaborator

What about then @paulzierep and me as first authors, @supernord as last, and everyone in the middle in alphabetical order?

Sorry for being late here, I agree on that !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants