-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add a lot of bilingual dictionaries using omegawiki #30
Comments
Dictionaries from this source are not of very high quality, IIRC. Apart from
that, OmegaWiki is discontinued and DictionaryForMIDs not very active, recently.
The interest in these dictionaries is very low.
Since it's the second dictionary source you are proposing, would you have
interest in writing an importer for it? I would be willing to help you getting
started.
Please keep reporting more dictionary sources, it is really just this particular
source that *I* am not really keen on. Opinions might vary.
@piotr, @micha137, what do you think?
|
One minor correction: I didn't see the other issues until now. It's not the
second source that you are proposing :-). In this case, your help would be even
more welcome!
Plese feel free to join our
[mailing list](https://sourceforge.net/projects/freedict/lists/freedict-beta)
for a more in-depth discussion.
|
I'm closing this issue, because I think we shouldn't consider OMEGA wiki. AFAIK, they wanted to merge with Wiktionary and we have importer scripts from WikDict.com for this. |
(Nearly?) each wiktionary project is a separate entity, so it's not obvious that omegawiki is going to merge into all wiktionaries, and I wouldn't hasten so much to close this ticket. The concept-to-form organisation of omegawiki could indeed yield some pretty exotic language pairs, potentially. |
I would say that Wiktionary has already outperformed OMEGA wiki for quite a few language pairs. Given how active people are, I would say the same will be true for less popular language pairs. Feel free to reopen the issue, but I have no ambitions whatsoever to work on this. |
You would say, or you know? :-) A few wiktionaries are very good, others got closed for dormancy (that surely improves the overall statistics). These tickets are not necessarily for you personally to take up, especially if you're planning on broadening the scale of the project. So thanks for your OK to re-open, it's better to have the resource visible. |
Hi,
[1] shows how to create bilingual dictionaries using omegawiki as a source. [2] uses these dictionaries for example. Could you add these dictionaries?
Regards, Andy
[1] http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Getting_bilingual_dictionaries_from_OmegaWiki
[2] http://dictionarymid.sourceforge.net/ http://dictionarymid.sourceforge.net/dictionaries/dictsBinlingualsOmegaWiki.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: