From bce2590aaef765327e59c14a666bcdc986c8c857 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fredrik Ekre <ekrefredrik@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:00:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove TODO list since everything is converted to issues

---
 TODO.md | 49 -------------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 49 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 TODO.md

diff --git a/TODO.md b/TODO.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 18681d6..0000000
--- a/TODO.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-# TODOs, notes, and various thoughts
-
-## TODOs
- - [x] `=` and `\in` should be `in` in for loops
- - [x] Space after `,` in tuples, function calls, function definitions, `{}` etc.
- - [x] No leading/trailing space in tuples etc `( a, b )` -> `(a, b)`
- - [ ] Disallow putting kwargs before all positional args when calling functions
- - [ ] Space after `;` in named tuples, keyword arguments (callsite and definitions)
- - [x] Indentation
- - [ ] Trim trailing `;` togheter with ws.
- - [x] Whitespace in ternaries
- - [x] Parenteses around expressions in `:` operator (e.g. `1 + 2:3` -> `(1 + 2):3)`)
-
-
-## Ideas
-
-- Normalize `1.0e3` -> `1.0e+3`? Normalize `1.0e+3` -> `1.0e3`? Leave alone? I
-  kinda thing it looks clearer with the `+` and for `-` it is necessary anyway
-  so that would make it symmetric.
-
-## Inconsistencies
-
-- The `spaces_around_operators` rule have the following inconsistencies.
-
-   - `:`, `^`, and `::` instead fall under `no_spaces_around_colon_etc`:
-     ```julia
-     # current formatting      # "consistent" formatting
-     a:b                       a : b                            ✖
-     a^b                       a ^ b                            ✖
-     a::b                      a :: b                           ✖
-     ```
-
-   - `<:` and `<:` fall under `no_spaces_around_colon_etc` if they have no LHS:
-     ```julia
-     # current formatting      # "consistent" formatting
-     a <: b                    a <: b                           ✔
-     a >: b                    a >: b                           ✔
-     a{c <: b}                 a{c <: b}                        ✔
-     a{c >: b}                 a{c >: b}                        ✔
-     a{<:b}                    a{<: b}                          ✖
-     a{>:b}                    a{>: b}                          ✖
-     ```
-
-## Bad decisions?
-
- - Space around operators: if there are more, leave alone? This usualy indicate
-   some kind of manual alignment. Perhaps we can align at `=` for connected
-   siblings.
- - Trimming trailing 0 in floats messes up alignment sometimes.