You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not sure if I've (again) missed something in the docs but is there a way to reduce the logging put out by the scanner? I suspect for one thing it's not helping performance in the least, but also I just had a scan fail due to lack of disk space. After digging around a bit I found out where my space had gone:
-rw-r--r--@ 1 matt staff 711M 22 Oct 16:48 sf-2024-10-22.log
drwxr-xr-x+ 101 matt staff 3.2K 22 Oct 16:40 ..
drwx------ 14 matt staff 448B 22 Oct 14:44 .
-rw-r--r--@ 1 matt staff 7.2G 21 Oct 21:14 sf-2024-10-21.log
Been running a few big scans this week, and our code base is large, but a 7GB log file seems like overkill?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Not sure if I've (again) missed something in the docs but is there a way to reduce the logging put out by the scanner? I suspect for one thing it's not helping performance in the least, but also I just had a scan fail due to lack of disk space. After digging around a bit I found out where my space had gone:
-rw-r--r--@ 1 matt staff 711M 22 Oct 16:48 sf-2024-10-22.log drwxr-xr-x+ 101 matt staff 3.2K 22 Oct 16:40 .. drwx------ 14 matt staff 448B 22 Oct 14:44 . -rw-r--r--@ 1 matt staff 7.2G 21 Oct 21:14 sf-2024-10-21.log
Been running a few big scans this week, and our code base is large, but a 7GB log file seems like overkill?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions