You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a workload where i read thousands of Excel files, and using openxlsx without do-syntax is several orders of magnitudes faster, because over 99% of the time is spent GCing when I use do-syntax.
I'm fine with manually closing the file, but it would be nice if it was documented that using do-syntax manually invokes the GC, or if there is another way to solve the bug on Windoes that manually invoking the GC is suposed to fix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have a workload where i read thousands of Excel files, and using
openxlsx
withoutdo
-syntax is several orders of magnitudes faster, because over 99% of the time is spent GCing when I usedo
-syntax.I'm fine with manually closing the file, but it would be nice if it was documented that using
do
-syntax manually invokes the GC, or if there is another way to solve the bug on Windoes that manually invoking the GC is suposed to fix.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: