You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The total number of GC-Net is 2.9 million; (2850785 according to my TensorFlow implementation)
The total number of PSM-Net is 5.2 million; (5224768 according to my TensorFlow implementation and original author's code)
Can anyone provide me the total number of parameters of GA-Net-11 and GA-Net-15? The author doesn't seem to be consistent when reporting those numbers in the paper. They omitted the whole feature extraction layers' parameters for PSM-net and their own model. However, I found that actually there feature extraction layers are crucial to the final results, more crucial than those aggregation net in terms of final performance. So I think it's important to compare the total number of model parameters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The total number of GC-Net is 2.9 million; (2850785 according to my TensorFlow implementation) The total number of PSM-Net is 5.2 million; (5224768 according to my TensorFlow implementation and original author's code)
Can anyone provide me the total number of parameters of GA-Net-11 and GA-Net-15? The author doesn't seem to be consistent when reporting those numbers in the paper. They omitted the whole feature extraction layers' parameters for PSM-net and their own model. However, I found that actually there feature extraction layers are crucial to the final results, more crucial than those aggregation net in terms of final performance. So I think it's important to compare the total number of model parameters.
Hi, I have the same question as yours. I find that the total number of PSMNet is 5.2 million in Jia-Ren's code, however the total number of PSMNet is 3.5 million mentioned in GA-Net. Besides, when I calculate the total number of GA-Net-15, I get the different result compared with 2.3 million in the paper. I re-read the paper and I think you are right. The parameter mentioned in the paper is maybe just the 3Dconv part, ignoring the feature extraction layers.
The total number of GC-Net is 2.9 million; (2850785 according to my TensorFlow implementation)
The total number of PSM-Net is 5.2 million; (5224768 according to my TensorFlow implementation and original author's code)
Can anyone provide me the total number of parameters of GA-Net-11 and GA-Net-15? The author doesn't seem to be consistent when reporting those numbers in the paper. They omitted the whole feature extraction layers' parameters for PSM-net and their own model. However, I found that actually there feature extraction layers are crucial to the final results, more crucial than those aggregation net in terms of final performance. So I think it's important to compare the total number of model parameters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: