You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, your result is surprisingly good, but the results I ran were very fuzzy and artificial trace in the holes region, why?
And I think you use (batch: image + mask )as input ,but i use( batch image + 1 mask) as input, Is it possible for this to lead to my unsatisfactory result? However, the problem still exists after I used (batch : image + mask). Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @sfwyly ,
Sorry for the late reply. The results I got are not good either. If you zoom in on the examples that I show, you can see that they are also full of artefacts.
Hi, your result is surprisingly good, but the results I ran were very fuzzy and artificial trace in the holes region, why?
And I think you use (batch: image + mask )as input ,but i use( batch image + 1 mask) as input, Is it possible for this to lead to my unsatisfactory result? However, the problem still exists after I used (batch : image + mask). Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: