You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see negative tolerances and laser diameter are forbidden there. However, I am making interlocking connections of steel, and order laser cutting at outsourcing company. Their software automatically considers laser ray diameter and we get (almost) exactly the same size as in DXFs. Moveover, some artifacts of cutting and oxide layer make part edges even a bit thicker than model, so I have to use a hammer to assemble them. This, definitely, is not the best manufacturing practice :? .
Thus if you could allow negative values there, this can expand scope of the Interlocking workbench usability. I suggest users will rarely set negative values by mistake, but if they will, there can be some checkbox to forbid it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am working on a plywood CNC project, and I have a similar use case.
What I am doing is setting the laser size to 0.0, and add some Thickness tolerance of 0.0 and "slow width tolerance" positive. Then I reduce the size of the tabs.
Then I forked the project to allow customize the dog bone radius and shift #49
If not, to change that tolerance you only need to change this file:
From freecad forum user (https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=35635&start=10#p412835):
I see negative tolerances and laser diameter are forbidden there. However, I am making interlocking connections of steel, and order laser cutting at outsourcing company. Their software automatically considers laser ray diameter and we get (almost) exactly the same size as in DXFs. Moveover, some artifacts of cutting and oxide layer make part edges even a bit thicker than model, so I have to use a hammer to assemble them. This, definitely, is not the best manufacturing practice :? .
Thus if you could allow negative values there, this can expand scope of the Interlocking workbench usability. I suggest users will rarely set negative values by mistake, but if they will, there can be some checkbox to forbid it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: