Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(cron): validate arguments in RunAt and improve timestamp handling #1498

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

roadtosixx
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Kenshiin13 Kenshiin13 changed the base branch from main to dev November 21, 2024 20:38
Copy link
Contributor

@Kenshiin13 Kenshiin13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolve Merge Conflicts

@@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ local lastTimestamp = false
---@param m number
---@param cb function|table
function RunAt(h, m, cb)
if type(h) ~= "number" or type(m) ~= "number" or (type(cb) ~= "function" and type(cb) ~= "table") then
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Type validation is already being handled in the cron:runAt event. Please remove the redundant code.

local currentDay = os.date("*t", timestamp).day
local currentMonth = os.date("*t", timestamp).month
local currentYear = os.date("*t", timestamp).year

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactor to call os.date("*t", timestamp) once, store the result in a local table, and extract the required fields (day, month, year) from that table. This improves efficiency by avoiding repeated parsing and enhances code readability and maintainability.

@Kenshiin13
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this due to inactivity. The relevant suggested changes are already implemented on the dev branch anyways.

@Kenshiin13 Kenshiin13 closed this Nov 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Recycle Bin
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants