Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decide which ESPAsyncWebServer fork should be canonical? #34

Open
egnor opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Decide which ESPAsyncWebServer fork should be canonical? #34

egnor opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@egnor
Copy link

egnor commented Jun 17, 2024

[edited based on discussions] The situation with ESPAsyncWebServer is a mess:

Ideally we'd designate one repo and merge the important fixes and improvements there, and any remaining forks would work off that if people need to add project-specific tweaks? And we could see about changing registry entries to point to that fork, or at least steer people there?

The most likely candidates seem like this one and @mathieucarbou's fork; Mathieu seems to be actively merging in fixes from elsewhere and seems to be willing to take up the mantle, so that's one promising option?

But, I'm sure people have Opinions...

@egnor
Copy link
Author

egnor commented Jun 21, 2024

From @mathieucarbou, another contender for One True EspAsyncWebServer fork here: https://github.com/mathieucarbou/ESPAsyncWebServer
(I wonder if there's anything in this fork that couldn't be replaced by that one ...)

@egnor egnor changed the title Merge library.properties from lacamera's fork? Decide which ESPAsyncWebServer fork should be canonical? Jun 22, 2024
@egnor
Copy link
Author

egnor commented Jun 22, 2024

(updated the main issue description after a discussion with mathieucarbou...)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant