You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am noticing instructions like _exec_empty cropping up quite a lot. I realize that in Python variable names can only include underscores and Alnum characters, but I wonder if it might make Push code a bit more readable to name these in the Mathematica style: ending in Q (indicating "question", I guess?).
So for example _exec_empty_Q.
Just a minor suggestion. In Clojure implementations I use exec-empty?, and it helps readability quite a bit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like this idea. It will help distinguish between instruction like _exec_emtpy and _exec_flush. To someone who doesn't have a full knowledge of the instruction set, those might appear to do the same thing with the current naming.
I am noticing instructions like
_exec_empty
cropping up quite a lot. I realize that in Python variable names can only include underscores andAlnum
characters, but I wonder if it might make Push code a bit more readable to name these in the Mathematica style: ending inQ
(indicating "question", I guess?).So for example
_exec_empty_Q
.Just a minor suggestion. In Clojure implementations I use
exec-empty?
, and it helps readability quite a bit.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: