Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P2P, Blockchain & Alternative decentralization systems #252

Closed
philippefutureboy opened this issue Jun 11, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

P2P, Blockchain & Alternative decentralization systems #252

philippefutureboy opened this issue Jun 11, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
needs proposal needs a writeup/one-pager/spec

Comments

@philippefutureboy
Copy link

Is this a feature request or a bug?

A discussion, quick suggestion :)

What do you want to talk about?

Alternative protocols & platforms to support a decentralized ecosystem.

Disclaimer: I do not have any experience in decentralized systems

So?

Have you considered using P2P protocols?

What about having a system like the IPFS or Skycoin for distributed data? The advantages I would see in using a blockchain solution is that you can offer both package signing and have a commonly agreed package history stored in the blockchain that is immutable.

What do you think? If you'd like I can see if I can grab a few experts in P2P/Blockchain/decentralized systems and invite them to join the discussion :)

Thank you for your initiative.

🚀

@superhawk610
Copy link
Contributor

superhawk610 commented Jun 11, 2019

IPFS came up in a discussion a couple days ago, let me see if I can find it...

EDIT: There's actually an existing issue thread here.

@wesleytodd
Copy link

wesleytodd commented Jun 17, 2019

Might be worth checking out Dat. It is "js native" and has a relatively thriving, if still small, maintainer/user base.

EDIT: I apparently did not read...sorry. I see in the other conversation that there is already discussion on this. Maybe close this one?

@philippefutureboy
Copy link
Author

@wesleytodd Dat was already proposed in #99, but one of the contributors of Dat said that Dat may not be a good fit for this type of application.

@wesleytodd
Copy link

My edit must have been after you posted. Sorry I had noticed that right after posting. Might be a good idea to close this issue so others don't make the same mistake as I?

@philippefutureboy
Copy link
Author

Good point => Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs proposal needs a writeup/one-pager/spec
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants