Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] Remove plugin build #197125

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 6, 2024
Merged

[ci] Remove plugin build #197125

merged 8 commits into from
Nov 6, 2024

Conversation

jbudz
Copy link
Member

@jbudz jbudz commented Oct 21, 2024

The platform plugin builds were used when functional tests were, at times, run from source.
This is mostly no longer a requirement. There are two remaining cypress scripts that I updated to use the build instead.

With the time saved I'm dropping the number of vCPUs from 16 to 8. These are mostly underutilized by this step, with the exception of the distribution plugin build.

jbudz added 2 commits October 21, 2024 14:06
The platform plugin builds were used at a time when functional tests
were, at times, run from source.

This is mostly no longer a requirement. There are two remaining cypress
scripts that I updated to use the build instead.
@jbudz
Copy link
Member Author

jbudz commented Oct 21, 2024

buildkite test this

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

@jbudz
Copy link
Member Author

jbudz commented Nov 1, 2024

buildkite test this

@jbudz
Copy link
Member Author

jbudz commented Nov 1, 2024

buildkite test this

@jbudz
Copy link
Member Author

jbudz commented Nov 1, 2024

buildkite test this

@jbudz
Copy link
Member Author

jbudz commented Nov 1, 2024

Build testing the defend workflows changes: https://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-pull-request/builds/247852

@jbudz jbudz added Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes backport:prev-minor Backport to (8.x) the previous minor version (i.e. one version back from main) labels Nov 1, 2024
@jbudz
Copy link
Member Author

jbudz commented Nov 4, 2024

buildkite test this

@jbudz jbudz requested a review from a team November 4, 2024 23:23
@jbudz jbudz marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2024 23:23
@jbudz jbudz requested review from a team as code owners November 4, 2024 23:23
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)

@jbudz jbudz requested review from a team, pzl and szwarckonrad and removed request for a team November 4, 2024 23:23
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky

Failed CI Steps

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

History

@jbudz jbudz merged commit 6b7c5b9 into elastic:main Nov 6, 2024
26 checks passed
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Starting backport for target branches: 8.x

https://github.com/elastic/kibana/actions/runs/11710943161

@jbudz
Copy link
Member Author

jbudz commented Nov 6, 2024

I'm going to leave the backport unresolved for a while to monitor for issues. This expectation has been built in to most of our test pipelines for years, there's a decent chance I missed something and will need to revert.

mgadewoll pushed a commit to mgadewoll/kibana that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
The platform plugin builds were used when functional tests were, at
times, run from source.
This is mostly no longer a requirement. There are two remaining cypress
scripts that I updated to use the build instead.

With the time saved I'm dropping the number of vCPUs from 16 to 8. These
are mostly underutilized by this step, with the exception of the
distribution plugin build.
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add a backport:* label or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 197125 locally

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the backport missing Added to PRs automatically when the are determined to be missing a backport. label Nov 7, 2024
jbudz added a commit to jbudz/kibana that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
The platform plugin builds were used when functional tests were, at
times, run from source.
This is mostly no longer a requirement. There are two remaining cypress
scripts that I updated to use the build instead.

With the time saved I'm dropping the number of vCPUs from 16 to 8. These
are mostly underutilized by this step, with the exception of the
distribution plugin build.
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

3 similar comments
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

6 similar comments
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

jbudz added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
@kibanamachine kibanamachine removed the backport missing Added to PRs automatically when the are determined to be missing a backport. label Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:prev-minor Backport to (8.x) the previous minor version (i.e. one version back from main) release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v9.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants