Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reexamining my idolization of David Attenborough #3

Open
HLR-04614 opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Reexamining my idolization of David Attenborough #3

HLR-04614 opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@HLR-04614
Copy link

Love the idea of "unveiling hidden curriculum" and also "recognizing contributions to hidden [diversity and equity] work", and that first step of recognizing what is hidden and more importantly getting those with power to recognize it, seems like a challenge. Admitting there is hidden curriculum in the first place is harder for those who are wedded to the culture/stories/head-figures which inspired their careers, and those are often the ones who do the teaching and head the departments. Especially in a scientific field where experts like being experts and are less excited about reframing what they thought they knew. In other organizations I've worked for, paradigm shifts happens because certain people retire. How do we get around that? It's great to have a roadmap like the Cronin paper that academic departments can use to begin the work of decolonizing their institutions and creating an anti-racist culture. How can we apply this roadmap in order to increase our self-awareness of existing colonial lenses as individuals, as small groups of invested community members, and as a larger U Maine organization without preaching to the choir?

Did I not realize or or did I just choose not to think about how so many famous people in the history of science (and other areas) got their fame and achievement only because they had the privilege and wealth to unburden themselves of labor and force it onto slaves? John Green talks about this in The Anthropocene Reviewed: "It’s no coincidence that the scientific revolution in Britain coincided with the rise of British participation in the Atlantic slave trade and the growing wealth being extracted from colonies and enslaved labor." Hearing that was the first time I'd thought about it- that was two weeks ago.

How can DEI committees ensure accountability?

How can we move beyond talking points of land acknowledgements but still do the science we need to do? The Cronin paper suggests collecting data only where you are invited. How practical is this advice and could there be unintended consequences of disproportionately limiting students over already established (and less diverse) faculty or limiting the ones who choose to respect this guideline and those who don't get to sample wherever they want?

Recommend: https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/watching-a-life-on-our-planet-or-how-i-ruined-david-attenborough-for-myself/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant