-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Publish the add-on on AMO #3
Comments
We should try to publish even an alpha version to go through AMO checks at least once before true release? |
Testing latest XPI 2.5.4 in Validation tool gave these results:
and full report:
|
How can we solve this validation problem? |
We have to rewrite binaries with another Twitter secret key and submit the source code with the addon. |
What about a new overlay for each user to enter his/her own Twitter secret key? |
It kills the UX. It's better to have a default hidden secret key (for users) that can be rewritten (for advanced users). |
I agree, even if for this dll/ctypes part I can not help much No contribution since weeks and we are running out of time
So, important Firefox milestones are version 43 (2015-12-15) and ultimately version 46 (2016-04-19) |
My suggestion was already in #8 Dialog for user defined keys |
Ping @echofox-team/core and community for quick decisions and contributions please 🙏 |
I think @ath0mas is quite right to start worrying about delay, but as I am not really comfortable with this part of programming hassle, it seems difficult for me to give constructive elements of answer. I really hope the core staff will have more positive feedbacks soon. |
I agree with @ath0mas suggestion. But I guess XUL add-ons all have dead ends because Mozilla wants to deprecate them. |
The only reason why I still use Firefox (and not Chrome) is the usage of XUL add-ons. I think a lot of people have a similar preference and Mozilla may have to accept that. |
In my case, I will use Firefox over any other browser because the customization support. Maybe will try Vivendi new browser |
@bylokk Why XUL and not HTML ? |
I'm just a user and not a dev. So that's a decision I cannot influence. |
I was just about to ask if you guys had a fix for this. 43 is live and echofon (echofox sound like a good rename) is perm-disabled with firefox demanding that I remove it. from my point of view, add-on siging is a bad thing and is only going to lead to devs not being able to publish any work. back to the problem at hadn, fake it. rename if needed but fake what ever the AMO is after and push an update. even if it never sees the "official" add-on page, at least the addon will still work. |
I'm going to take a look, we have to do this before 44 go live. |
I just sent a test to review, it's already signed, it should work for everyone. I don't know if Mozilla will manually review it. We could distribute it through GitHub while looking for solutions about binaries. Here's the XPIs (I don't know if it's really platform dependant), replace zip with xpi.
EDIT : please, do not create a release with this as it is a test with some code failing (coming from my own repo). |
Can not seems to complete the connection to tweeter when adding an account. Brings the OAuth screen in blank. |
Don't forget to disable Echofon as I change the name for Echofox. The OAuth screen is working for me and we don't have ads menu anymore (while still in code, but that's another problem). |
Linux build works good for me 👍 |
Yeay, here's my proposal :
|
Ok, it's working for me, too, after my mix-up about not being sure about how to install it. But it's great, thank you very much for this! Like the new name, too. |
about @YoruNoHikage proposal, and to my mind: Important to know: AMO currently publishes new addons very quickly (2-3 days max) as soon as there is no validation problem, but once published, next versions sent will take normal delay (5-7+ weeks 😨 ... for example, currently 177 addons in review queue) |
I'm afraid publishing the add-on as-is publicly will lead to be rejected as the binaries source code isn't available... But we could try. |
Addons.Mozilla.Org :) |
You told you signed previous xpi/Zip files |
Signed it on AMO ;) but I think publishing on it means manual review for which Echofox will surely be rejected (but we can try). That's why I said :
|
Downloaded the file again, echofox-2.6.0-fx-windows.zip drap & drop to add-on Window on Firefox, restarted Firefox. Open up the add-on (which still appears as echofon to me) add Account... and the OAuth with Twitter appears, in Blank as the image attached. As this could be a network issue not loading the webpage asked a friend to do it What I'm doing wrong here? PD: When choosing from the add on toolbar the icon appears as echofon, the same when you hover over.. |
Oh right, I just created a new profile, and had this bug. I have an idea why and I think it's related with what we are doing in #39. When we're sure our "alpha" works, we're going to repost some XPIs. Thanks for discovering this before the release ! :P |
Hmm ok, I'm having issues now, too. It was working, but now it's stopped updating my feed and It's only showing tweets from 6 hours ago, and even then it only does that if I switch over to a different tab in the side bar, otherwise my feed is empty. Also the close button on the sidebar no longer works, though closing it by pressing the Echofox button does. I didn't start with a new profile, I'm using my old one. |
Can you test the new alpha in #39 ? @Nehemoth @kalinda99 |
Testing at work. Working like a Charm. Firefox 43.0.1 x64 on Windows 7 x64 SP1. Awesome Job guys |
Yup, working great now! Thanks! |
According to the comment made by @ath0mas (third point), I suppose issue #30 has to be considered here. |
Depends on #1 to avoid Copyright infringement of Echofon trademark...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: