Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add feedback to the model #173

Open
jtwalsh0 opened this issue Oct 7, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Add feedback to the model #173

jtwalsh0 opened this issue Oct 7, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@jtwalsh0
Copy link
Member

jtwalsh0 commented Oct 7, 2016

There are at least two types:

  1. Quality of the predictions: we've given lists of predictions to our partners, and they have told us whether they agree. For example, we've flagged some officers as high risk that the department thinks is not.
  2. Quality of the explanations: we give four or five reasons for a particular flag. They sometimes tell us whether they agree with the explanations.

Our model should take that feedback into account and should weigh the feedback by that individual's past feedback quality (i.e. if we say an officer is low risk but a supervisor thinks the officer is high risk then the officer has an adverse incident, we should weigh that supervisor's feedback more heavily. Item response theory provides useful guidance when thinking about this.)

We can start to model with the feedback they've given us, but down the road the interface should make it easy for them to provide the feedback.

@jtwalsh0
Copy link
Member Author

Department gave feedback on specific predictions. Build at least three new features:

  • Whether the department provided feedback
  • Whether the department provided positive feedback for that unit
  • Whether the department provided negative feedback for that unit
  • We need to add a timestamp for when the feedback was provided.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants