Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate options for spellchecking (pre-commit hook? GitHub Action?) #14

Open
Tracked by #8
alexdewar opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Tracked by #8
Labels
osb Related to the Open Source Booster programme

Comments

@alexdewar
Copy link
Collaborator

alexdewar commented Nov 27, 2024

It would be helpful to have spelling checked, especially in documentation.

Here are some solutions I've used before in some configuration or other:

We need to make sure that it's not too difficult to configure and doesn't produce too many false positives, otherwise it will be more annoying than useful.

As with many of the other issues, this is something we could apply just to this repo or could also include in the template to run in users' repos too.

@alexdewar alexdewar mentioned this issue Nov 27, 2024
17 tasks
@djmaxus djmaxus added the osb Related to the Open Source Booster programme label Nov 27, 2024
@djmaxus
Copy link
Owner

djmaxus commented Nov 27, 2024

I fancy the idea of utilising markdownlint via some popular GitHub workflow such as super-linter remotely and respective VS Code extension locally by default.

What do you think?

@alexdewar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@djmaxus This is about checking spelling rather than linting markdown files per se. I've added a proper description to the issue now.

@djmaxus
Copy link
Owner

djmaxus commented Dec 18, 2024

I see now, thanks!
I already use CSpell via their VSCode extension, so I'm leaning towards it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
osb Related to the Open Source Booster programme
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants