Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase performance on find_existing_attribute_option_group query #338

Open
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

viggo-devries
Copy link
Contributor

When trying to create alot of options this is really slow

specialunderwear and others added 11 commits January 24, 2024 14:34
* Implemented faster attributes save

* renamed for clarity
…ct to avoid transferring (#331)

attributesvalues from parent to child.
Use the same database as the passed-in manager
* The image and file fields where nolonger working.

This PR restores that functionality.

* nergens voor
When an image product attribute is `null`, the product API would throw the
following exception:

```
ValueError: The 'value_image' attribute has no file associated with it.

  […]

  File "rest_framework/serializers.py", line 522, in to_representation
    ret[field.field_name] = field.to_representation(attribute)
  File "rest_framework/serializers.py", line 686, in to_representation
    return [
  File "rest_framework/serializers.py", line 687, in <listcomp>
    self.child.to_representation(item) for item in iterable
  File "rest_framework/serializers.py", line 522, in to_representation
    ret[field.field_name] = field.to_representation(attribute)
  File "oscarapi/serializers/fields.py", line 227, in to_representation
    return value.value.url
  File "django/db/models/fields/files.py", line 66, in url
    self._require_file()
  File "django/db/models/fields/files.py", line 41, in _require_file
    raise ValueError(
```

This patch fixes this by checking if the image field has a value before trying
to generate a URL.
Fixes handling of null product image attributes
Copy link
Member

@specialunderwear specialunderwear left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@viggo-devries this code is non working, see the test results

@viggo-devries viggo-devries changed the base branch from main to master May 15, 2024 13:12
@@ -57,9 +57,8 @@ def find_existing_attribute_option_group(name, options):
AttributeOptionGroup.objects.filter(name=name)
.annotate(options_count=models.Count("options"))
.filter(options_count=len(options))
.filter(options__option__in=options)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why 2 times filter?

why not

.filter(options_count=len(options), options__option__in=options)

@viggo-devries viggo-devries force-pushed the improve_attributoptiongroup_query branch from 34e5a05 to f65e2e8 Compare May 15, 2024 13:50
@viggo-devries viggo-devries force-pushed the improve_attributoptiongroup_query branch from f65e2e8 to bc28a39 Compare June 4, 2024 14:59
Base automatically changed from master to main September 20, 2024 11:24
@specialunderwear
Copy link
Member

@viggo-devries You have to rebase and do this again, there are way too many conflicts for me to be able to merge this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants