Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Links in bulletpoints are not underlined #24

Open
pranshukharkwal opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 8 comments
Open

Links in bulletpoints are not underlined #24

pranshukharkwal opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 8 comments

Comments

@pranshukharkwal
Copy link
Contributor

Bug Report

Description

If a link is present in a bullet point, the anchor text is not underlined.
I am not sure if it is expected to be like that, but I think it would be better if there is an underline to indicate the link.

Steps to Reproduce

Check out this blog post - https://devbae.tech/2020/06/10/introduction-to-graphql.html

Expected Behaviour

In the using the IDEs section, the anchor text of the links in the bullet points should be underlined

Actual Behaviour

The anchor texts are not underlined

Settings

  • Browser used: Chrome
  • OS: Windows 10

Screenshots, if any

devbae-bug

@aashish-ak
Copy link
Member

This is a good observation @pranshukharkwal, will look into it :)

@aashish-ak aashish-ak added bug Something isn't working easy Easy to do for beginners good first issue Good for newcomers ui Improvisation in UI labels Jun 16, 2020
@Signior-X
Copy link
Member

Can I do this?

@aashish-ak
Copy link
Member

Sure @Signior-X

@Signior-X
Copy link
Member

Signior-X commented Jun 26, 2020

@aashish-ak
Ek doubt hai regarding this issue.... yadi iske heesab se underline hone chahhiye to firr to isme bhi underline hoega na?

Yeh Jo list hai isme sidethrough vaale, yeh bhi underline hone chahiye firr to.....
To kya specific pehchaan honi chahiye ki list ke andar ke links ko underline hona chahiye ya nhi?

Screenshot from 2020-06-27 03-00-49

@aashish-ak
Copy link
Member

aashish-ak commented Jun 26, 2020

Sirf jo lists blog content me hn whi underline honi chahiye to differentiate between normal text and links. Toc or sidebar me its obvious ki wo links hi honge isliye udhar underline karne ki zarurat nhi honi chahiye.

@Signior-X
Copy link
Member

Signior-X commented Jun 27, 2020

Yes vahi keh raha hu jo isme bold letters ma list hai strikethrough kiye hue vo blog content ma aata hai..... To vobhi underline hojayega.
See the list of what we are learning today.....

Screenshot from 2020-06-27 10-53-13

@aashish-ak
Copy link
Member

Yes, I think this is an issue, I don't know why the numbered list is allowing the underlines for links, and the unordered list is not. This is an issue with the markdown parser itself, you can see maybe if the blog content links can be identified separately and then you can underline them by using simple CSS, but if you can't, we will look for some other way to do this.

@Signior-X
Copy link
Member

Signior-X commented Jul 15, 2020

Yes, I think this is an issue, I don't know why the numbered list is allowing the underlines for links, and the unordered list is not. This is an issue with the markdown parser itself, you can see maybe if the blog content links can be identified separately and then you can underline them by using simple CSS, but if you can't, we will look for some other way to do this.

No... No.... It does not like this. Actually I did what you suggested that to show links in lists. That bug, which @pranshukharkwal told solved, but then this issue appears. That all the links in the main content becomes like this.
It is actually a CSS Bug
So what can I do....
the tags inside main content have the underline, this will make all the ordered and unordered lists links underlined.
So what I am saying is... after doing this, it does not look good as I shown in the above picture.

@Signior-X Signior-X removed their assignment Sep 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants