You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Also a follow up question. If I understand the methodology correctly, the multivariate LMM in MegaLMM is a reparametrization of the standard multivariate LMM when the number of factors (k) is sufficiently large. However, if the number of factors is not sufficiently large, then I'm guessing that the model fitted in MegaLMM is an approximation of the multivariate LMM model. With this in mind, is there any way of knowing how to set k as being as small as possible before the accuracy of the posterior distributions really start to deteriorate?
Thanks again,
Timothy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also a follow up question. If I understand the methodology correctly, the multivariate LMM in MegaLMM is a reparametrization of the standard multivariate LMM when the number of factors (k) is sufficiently large. However, if the number of factors is not sufficiently large, then I'm guessing that the model fitted in MegaLMM is an approximation of the multivariate LMM model. With this in mind, is there any way of knowing how to set k as being as small as possible before the accuracy of the posterior distributions really start to deteriorate?
Thanks again,
Timothy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: