You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! I'm using DeepTools to plot coverage over a list of significantly differential accessible peaks from ATAC-seq data. However, I'm running into a strange issue: the resolution of the heatmap seems to vary depending on which BED file I use, even though the underlying BigWig files and sequence data are exactly the same. Here is my code I am using to plot both of these graphs, the only thing different is the inputted bed files:
The command runs fine and a plot is outputted. Both BED files seem properly formatted and I don’t see any glaring differences between them. However, the resulting heatmap from the second BED file looks much more pixelated and of lower resolution. Further I have plotted on the overlap between the two bed files and I am still getting the pixellated heatmap, so this is not that the regions are different.
Any suggestions on how I can make the resolution more consistent across different BED files? The current difference makes it challenging to publish the figures since they look so different.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
deeptools 3.5.4
Python 3.10.13
Hi! I'm using DeepTools to plot coverage over a list of significantly differential accessible peaks from ATAC-seq data. However, I'm running into a strange issue: the resolution of the heatmap seems to vary depending on which BED file I use, even though the underlying BigWig files and sequence data are exactly the same. Here is my code I am using to plot both of these graphs, the only thing different is the inputted bed files:
computeMatrix reference-point
-S /home/ec2-user/atac_analysis_gorkin/heatmaps/1-R1_final.bw
/home/ec2-user/atac_analysis_gorkin/heatmaps/1-R2_final.bw
/home/ec2-user/atac_analysis_gorkin/heatmaps/2-R1_final.bw
/home/ec2-user/atac_analysis_gorkin/heatmaps/2-R2_final.bw
/home/ec2-user/atac_analysis_gorkin/heatmaps/3-R1_final.bw
/home/ec2-user/atac_analysis_gorkin/heatmaps/3-R2_final.bw
-R /home/ec2-user/atac_analysis_gorkin/heatmaps/loss.bed /home/ec2-user/atac_analysis_gorkin/heatmaps/gain.bed \
--referencePoint center
-a 2500 -b 2500 --outFileName /home/ec2-user/atac_analysis_gorkin/heatmaps/matrix_compute_loss_only.tab.gz
plotHeatmap
-m /home/ec2-user/atac_analysis_gorkin/heatmaps/matrix_compute_loss_only.tab.gz
-out /home/ec2-user/atac_analysis_gorkin/heatmaps/heatmaps_loss_only
--heatmapHeight 15
--zMax 10
--missingDataColor 1 \
The command runs fine and a plot is outputted. Both BED files seem properly formatted and I don’t see any glaring differences between them. However, the resulting heatmap from the second BED file looks much more pixelated and of lower resolution. Further I have plotted on the overlap between the two bed files and I am still getting the pixellated heatmap, so this is not that the regions are different.
Any suggestions on how I can make the resolution more consistent across different BED files? The current difference makes it challenging to publish the figures since they look so different.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: