You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am not sure what is rationale behind dropping the subClassOf triple. Goal of the ticket is to explain what is rationale behind that change or add missing triple.
The relationship is used in different places, see pictures:
I did not find when triples "?x rdfs:subClassOf ?y" were removed from SSP (it seems like they were never there), but I found multiple problematic cases such as <misto, vec>. Within my input of generating forms from SSP 44 problematic cases can be found by query:
Relation between místo and věc changed/was weakened from rdfs:subClassOf to skos:broader.
There used to be subClassOf relation:
slovník-gov:generický/umístění/pojem/místo rdfs:subClassOf slovník-gov:generický/věci/pojem/věc
Now there is only skos:broader relation:
slovník-gov:generický/umístění/pojem/místo skos:broader slovník-gov:generický/věci/pojem/věc
I am not sure what is rationale behind dropping the subClassOf triple. Goal of the ticket is to explain what is rationale behind that change or add missing triple.
The relationship is used in different places, see pictures:
Visualization in OFN Turistické cíle
Visualization in Ontographer
I did not find when triples "?x rdfs:subClassOf ?y" were removed from SSP (it seems like they were never there), but I found multiple problematic cases such as <misto, vec>. Within my input of generating forms from SSP 44 problematic cases can be found by query:
Result is here:
query-result.csv
In whole SSP there are the same query returns 147 answers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: