-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CRAN / Bioconductor availability #2
Comments
CRAN submission was in the works, but was torpedoed by a now-defunct (and unlisted) package of the same name. The whole submission was ready to go, passing all checks, right until I received an email from an impolite person with a german-sounding name, informing me that the name was already taken, by a package that doesn't really exist. This irked me to no end. Bioconductor, however, is a strong possibility; the only thing that would need to happen would be compatibility with their |
note to self: comments would need to be added in the vignette, too, to make it clear "in bioconductor world, use blah blah blah" |
CRAN admin emails are notoriously short and rude. It is a classic. Bioconductor has Code of Conduct to promote friendly and inclusive behavior, hopefully that helps. Really a pity if the name was taken already. It is also against Bioconductor guidelines to use a name that has been taken by a CRAN pkg. "A package name should be descriptive and not already exist as a current package (case-insensitive) in Bioconductor or CRAN. Avoid names that are easily confused with existing package names, or that imply a temporal (e.g., ExistingPackage2) or qualitative (e.g., ExistingPackagePlus) relationship." "An easy way to check whether your name is already in use is to check that the following command fails"
|
For discussion on SummarizedExperiment, see #3 |
Bioconductor has some additional requirements for package development, compared to CRAN, as described in the package guidelines. One can add BiocCheck to automated build checks. These must pass without errors or substantial warnings/notes before Bioc submission is possible.
|
I think it could still go in BioConductor because there isn't a current CRAN package with the name. Note that |
Yes that's a good point. |
Thanks for this interesting piece of work for microbiome analysis and interpretation.
Making the package available through CRAN (or Bioconductor). This could support the handling of dependencies and support interoperability across many different platforms.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: