-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is there some way to hide the rustc output? #30
Comments
Hmm, normally that output is captured and hidden, and even We could add some debug/verbosity control in |
Thanks for the quick answer. It looks like Firefox's build uses I would greatly appreciate if |
But add an environment variable to allow showing it, if wanted. Fixes cuviper#30
Why did you close? |
Maybe I misunderstood, wasn't this resoved in #32 ? |
That's not merged yet though. |
My bad, I saw something landing into mozilla-central and thought it was resolved. |
Hi,
Firefox's build and CI tooling parses the logs including verbose build script output to find and highlight errors. It helps a lot with quickly figuring out where build problems are, gets false positives from autocfg as it sees the rustc errors generated by attempts at determining if configurations build.
For example this:
Gets picked up in a linux64 build and confuses the tooling.
Is there a way for autocfg to consume the output of rustc in a way that doesn't make it show up the logs of the build that calls into autocfg?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: