-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 387
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support cargo-auditable
#1172
Comments
I'm not at all familiar with Docker, but if |
Alternatively you could use the pre-build hook to install |
Yep, I think it's possible.
I'd do that if |
We don't provide prebuilt binaries right now - perhaps that's something we ought to use But you can easily create your own binary cache with |
Well, since P.S. I actually is one of the maintainers of I wish |
I believe that's what custom Docker images are for? You can build the image once, then cache it? Alternatively we could have Github Actions build |
Yeah, that's a reasonable solution.
I would definitely love that.
I would do so if I have time.
Oh bootstraping, but that can be cached right? |
Mostly, yes. Regardless, we need to bootstrap only when we cut a new release, so I'm OK with CI times for those particular jobs being high. |
I think this is a duplicate of #716, but we did not consider workspace wrappers in the current implementation, right @Alexhuszagh ? |
Right now as long as you copy over the The only potential issue I can see is the container's glibc being too old, which applies to all subcommands, and you could work around that by building with statically linked musl. |
I see this has been closed as completed, but I can't find any recent pull requests that seem relevant. #716 is also still open. Could you point me to the changes made to support it, and how can I make use of |
@Shnatsel I closed this because I switched to using |
Sorry, I have reopened it. |
A custom image or a pre-build hook can be used as a solutions. I suppose this can be closed in favor of #716 that tracks support for all subcommands. |
yes lets move it to #716 |
supposedly you can mark issues as duplicate, lets try Duplicate of #716 edit: nope :) |
P.S. cargo-quickinstall has been using |
Checklist
Describe your request
I would like to use
cargo-auditable
along withcross
to cross build a binary that is auditable.I've already posted this on
cargo-auditable
rust-secure-code/cargo-auditable#95 but @Shnatsel suggests me to file an issue here:Describe why this would be a good inclusion for
cross
It will make it possible to use
cross
withcargo-auditable
.Additionally any program that uses
RUSTC_WORKSPACE_WRAPPER
can interoperate withcross
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: