From 3310d91ef8377ec157b8052fe8d37a1dd6a5d7dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Noetzlin Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:17:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] update changelog --- CHANGELOG.md | 14 ++------------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md index 80bdec5792..4be3bbe606 100644 --- a/CHANGELOG.md +++ b/CHANGELOG.md @@ -25,17 +25,6 @@ Interchain Security v3 uses SDK 0.47 and IBC 7. * `[x/ccv/provider]` (fix) [#977](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/pull/977) Avoids panicking the provider when an unbonding delegation was removed through a `CancelUnbondingDelegation` message. * `[x/ccv/democracy]` (feat) [#1019](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/pull/1019) Whitelisting non-legacy params in the "democracy module" require the entire module to be whitelisted. -## v2.3.0-provider-lsm - -*November 15, 2023* - -* (fix!) [#1422](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/pull/1422) Fix the misbehaviour handling by verifying the signatures of byzantine validators. - -## v2.2.0-provider-lsm - -### Cryptographic verification of equivocation -* New feature enabling the provider chain to verify equivocation evidence on its own instead of trusting consumer chains, see [EPIC](https://github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/issues/732). - ## v2.1.0-provider-lsm Date: September 15th, 2023 @@ -185,4 +174,5 @@ RS consist of the following core features: In addition, RS has the following features: - **Key Assignment**: Enables validator operators to use different consensus keys for each consumer chain validator node that they operate. -- **Jail Throttling**: Enables the provider to slow down a "worst case scenario" attack where a malicious consumer binary attempts to jail a significant amount (> 2/3) of the voting power, effectively taking control of the provider. \ No newline at end of file +- **Jail Throttling**: Enables the provider to slow down a "worst case scenario" attack where a malicious consumer binary attempts to jail a significant amount (> 2/3) of the voting power, effectively taking control of the provider. +