Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relationships between objects; what we really need? #7

Open
corot opened this issue May 30, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Relationships between objects; what we really need? #7

corot opened this issue May 30, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@corot
Copy link
Owner

corot commented May 30, 2014

I have implemented relationships a simple filter criteria: "give me all the annotations that ...bla bla bla... and that are related with x, y OR z.

Is this enough? Abstract relationship and let the apps to provide the semantics of it?

This work on Piyush usecase of doors and approach points, bit... can we imagine more complicated scenarios that require something more powerful?

@corot corot added the question label May 30, 2014
corot added a commit that referenced this issue May 30, 2014
@stonier
Copy link
Collaborator

stonier commented Jun 4, 2014

I think this is something that will evolve. It's enough to start playing with the idea. Eventually though we might have our own language to express these relationships. The world model was using the idea of 'in'. Another relationship might be 'connected'.

It might be useful to see what others do. For example in the 'doom' style gaming world or MUD's. How do they express connections between all the objects/actors in the world?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants