You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it would be interesting to have an implementation of write_json_file and write_geojson_file in a memory buffer, which returns the raw vector of the JSON/GEOJSON file to avoid writing to disk in cases where the goal is to get the raw data from the file.
Regards,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Apologies for the delayed response. In general, this functionality would be interesting for data transmission processes in raw format. I believe it would have significant potential in libraries like bigrquery, plumber, etc.
As an example, currently, when you want to obtain the raw data from a JSON using yyjsonr, you have to first write the JSON file and then read the raw data. However, this is inefficient because it involves using disk storage.
The idea would be to introduce a parameter similar to what was implemented in nanoparquet r-lib/nanoparquet#31, or a new function, allowing direct access to raw data without the need for intermediate disk storage.
Hi @coolbutuseless,
I think it would be interesting to have an implementation of write_json_file and write_geojson_file in a memory buffer, which returns the raw vector of the JSON/GEOJSON file to avoid writing to disk in cases where the goal is to get the raw data from the file.
Regards,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: