-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: systemd int tests: systemctl stop, times out #23480
Comments
We have a ton of systemd/quadlet based test in system tests so would anyone object to me nuking the test from e2e? |
I would be fine with that. |
Before we sweep this under the rug... this has triggered two more times (see below). Looking at journal on the latest one, I see
Could that be related? And since this is a debian-only bug, WDYT of just skipping the test on debian?
|
I don't think it is related to the errors there. Looking at the test output I see
systemd-executer is the main pid of the unit??? If I read systemd docs correctly this might be normal as it means it has not yet executed our podman process. Looking at a passing test this is makes more sense
I think it is possible that stop is called to early where it has no effect (or SIGTERM was just ignored) so the unit just keeps running until systemd goes into its 90s default timeout and as we also wait 90s we timeout before system had the time to kill all processes and return and given the units uses Regardless these kind of systemd units are wrong (unsupported by us), they do not use our wanted cgroup settings such as cgroups=split, systemd notify, etc... As such I see no point in testing this here. |
One-off (so far) in debian root:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: