This repository contains the code and auxiliary data associated to the "data-driven discovery of new bio-orthogonal click reactions" project. Code is provided "as-is". Minor edits may be required to tailor the scripts for different computational systems. Additionally, for some steps of the workflow, intermediate files need to be generated as a preliminary step (vide infra).
- python 3.10
- autode 1.2
- rdkit 2020.03
- ipykernel 6.9
- pandas 1.4
- pebble 4.6
- xtb 6.3
- tqdm 4.64
- pip 2.22
- rdchiral 1.1
Additionally, in order to execute the autodE high-throughput reaction profile computation workflow, Gaussian09/Gaussian16 needs to be accessible. More information about the autodE module can be found here.
To set up the conda environment:
conda env create --name <env-name> --file environment.yml
The complete workflow associated with this project can be broken down in the following elementary steps:
- Define the search space of dipoles and dipolarophiles (both synthetic and biofragment-based examples), generate a representative dataset of cycloaddition reactions and compute the associated reaction profiles in a high-throughput manner (link).
- Compute QM descriptors for each dipole and dipolarophile in a high-throughput manner (link).
- Select an appropriate machine learning model architecture (here: multitask GNN ensemble -> link).
- Generate an exhaustive list of reaction SMILES based on all dipole - biofragment-based dipolarophile combinations; generate the QM descriptor input for each generated reaction (link).
- Iterate through an active learning loop to refine the dataset (auxiliary scripts can be found here). This loop consists of the following steps:
- Train an ML model on the current instance of the dataset.
- Use the trained model to predict activation and reaction energies for all the biofragment-based, i.e., native, reactions.
- Select promising dipoles for bio-orthogonal click applications based on the predictions made, i.e., retain only the dipoles which are not too reactive with the native dipolarophiles.
- Generate reaction SMILES for every combination between a promising dipole and any synthetic dipolarophile; generate the QM descriptor input for each generated reaction.
- Use the trained model to predict activation and reaction energies for each reaction SMILES generated in the previous step.
- Select promising synthetic reactions.
- Sample a subset of the selected promising synthetic reactions, add the competing native reactions involving the dipoles present in this subset and compute the corresponding reaction profiles.
- Add the newly computed reaction profiles to the dataset and start the next iteration.
- Once the dataset is sufficiently enriched with promising bio-orthogonal click reactions, train the model one last time on the final version (the final trained model can be found here). Then screen through the chemical space one last time with relaxed selection criteria and generate final estimates for the bio-orthogonal click potential for each of the synthetic reactions in the search space (link).
Below, the various auxiliary scripts, directories and repositories developed to (partially) automate this workflow are discussed in more detail.
A separate repository was set up for the definition of the search space and dataset generation. It can be accessed here. Instruction on how to run the provided scripts can be found in the associated README.md
file.
The scripts in this repository were also used to validate selected reactions in the active learning loop.
A separate repository was set up for the high-throughput computation of QM descriptors. It can be accessed here. Instruction on how to run the provided scripts can be found in the associated README.md
file.
A separate repository was set up for the multitask (QM-augmented) GNN model. It can be accessed here. Instruction on how to run the provided scripts can be found in the associated README.md
file.
All the files related to the baseline models are included in the baseline_models
directory. The main.py
script, which runs each of the baseline models sequentially, can be executed as follows:
python main.py [--csv-file <path to the file containing the rxn-smiles>] [--input-file <path to the .pkl input file>] [--split-dir <path to the folder containing the requested splits for the cross validation>] [--n-fold <the number of folds to use during cross validation'>]
A version of the descriptor input file is included in the data_files
directory: input_alt_models.pkl
. To generate an input file from scratch, the get_descs.py
script can be employed:
python get_descs.py --csv-file <path to the file containing the rxn-smiles and targets> --atom-descs-file <path to the .pkl-file containing atom descriptors> --reaction-descs-file <path to the .pkl-file containing reaction descriptors>
where the .csv
file, as well as the atom- and reaction-descriptor files are the outputs of the get_descriptors.py
script in the QM_desc_autodE repository (vide supra).
The files related to reaction SMILES generation can be found in the rxn_smiles_gen
directory. Dipole, as well as biofragment-based and synthetic dipolarophile lists can be found as .csv
files in the data_files
sub-directory. Additionally, the selected dipoles in the consecutive iterations are included as well. Reaction SMILES can be generated with the help of the generate_rxn_smiles.py
script:
python generate_rxn_smiles.py --file-name-dipoles <csv input file for dipoles> --file-name-dipolarophiles <csv input file for dipolarophiles> --output-base-name <base name for the output files> [--num-cores <number of cores>]
For each of the screening steps, a script can be found in the active_learning
directory. Additionally, the get_pred.py
script, which combines the outputted predictions of the (QM augmented) GNN model with the reaction SMILES from the generated reaction SMILES .csv
file to yield input files for the screening scripts, can also be found in this directory. The latter script can be executed as follows:
python get_pred.py --iteration <iteration of the active learning loop> --predictions-file <path to the (unprocessed) predictions file> --rxn-smiles-file <path to .csv file containing the reaction SMILES>
In practice, the following command can be run to test this script within the repository (some of the data-files have been subsampled to reduce their size):
python get_pred.py --iteration 0 --predictions-file data_files/model_iteration0/bio_predictions.csv --rxn-smiles-file data_files/bio_reactions_data.csv
extract_promising_dipoles.py
facilitates the selection of promising dipoles, i.e., dipoles which are not too reactive with native dipolarophiles:
python extract_promising_dipoles.py --predictions-file <input .csv file containing predicted reaction and activation energies> [--threshold-lower <threshold to decide whether a dipole is too reactive with biofragments>]
The retained dipoles -- together with some additional files containing summarizing statistics -- are stored in a newly generated folder, bio_filter
, as a .csv
file: dipoles_above_treshold.csv
. This file can copied into the reaction SMILES generation folder (vide supra) to generate the (pre-filtered) synthetic search space of the active learning loop.
In practice, the following command can be run to test this script within the repository (note that get_pred.py
has to be run for both bio_predictions.csv
and synthetic_predictions.csv
first):
python extract_promising_dipoles.py --predictions-file predictions_bio_iteration0.csv
extract_promising_reactions.py
facilitates the selection of promising synthetic reactions, i.e., selective reactions that are fast under physiological conditions and can be expected to be irreversible:
python extract_promising_reactions.py --predictions-file <input .csv file containing predicted reaction and activation energies> [--threshold-dipolarophiles <threshold for the mean activation energy of a dipolarophile to gauge intrinsic reactivity>] [--threshold-reverse-barrier <threshold for the reverse barrier (to ensure irreversibility)>] [--max-g-act <maximal G_act for a dipole-dipolarophile combination to be considered suitable>]
In practice, the following command can be run to test this script within the repository:
python extract_promising_reactions.py --predictions-file data_files/predictions_synthetic_sample.csv
Finally, there are scripts for sampling of the promising reactions for validation. sample_promising_reactions0.py
was used during the zeroth iteration to select up to 5 promising synthetic reactions involving 1 out of 20 sampled dipoles. The selected synthetic reactions were subsequently complemented with the corresponding biologically inspired reactions involving the same dipoles. This script can be executed as follows:
python sample_promising_reactions0.py --promising-reactions-file <.csv file containing predicted reaction and activation energies for the promising reactions> [--number-validation-dipoles <the number of validation dipoles to sample>]
In practice, the following command can be run to test this script within the repository:
python sample_promising_reactions0.py --promising-reactions-file promising_synthetic_reactions.csv --number-validation-dipoles 4
sample_promising_reactions1.py
was used during the first iteration to select all the promising dipoles which weren't selected as part of the zeroth iteration, and for each of these dipoles, all the reactions involving non-cyclooctyne-based dipolarophiles were retained (since cyclooctynes were severly overrepresented in the zeroth iteration). For the dipoles for which less than 5 reactions could be selected in this manner, reactions involving cyclooctyne as the dipolarophile were sampled until 5 reactions were reached. This script can be executed as follows:
python sample_promising_reactions1.py --promising-reactions-file <.csv file containing predicted reaction and activation energies for the promising reactions>
sample_promising_reactions2.py
was used during the second iteration to select all the promising dipoles which weren't considered as part of the zeroth or first iteration. For each of these dipoles, all the reactions involving another dipolarophile than cyclooctyne were selected first. If this yielded less than 10 selected reactions, any reaction involving a previously unseen cyclooctyne was selected next. Finally, reactions involving previously encountered cyclooctynes were added until the target of 10 selected reactions was reached.
python sample_promising_reactions2.py --promising-reactions-file <.csv file containing predicted reaction and activation energies for the promising reactions>
All the scripts used for the final screening can be found in the final_screening
directory. The first script, extract_dipoles.py
, facilitates the selection of promising dipoles, i.e., dipoles which are not too reactive with native dipolarophiles:
python extract_dipoles.py --predictions-file <input .csv file containing predicted reaction and activation energies> [--threshold-lower <threshold to decide whether a dipole is too reactive with biofragments>]
The retained dipoles -- together with some additional files containing summarizing statistics -- are stored in a newly generated folder, bio_filter_final
, as a .csv
file: dipoles_above_treshold.csv
.
In practice, the following command can be run to test this script within the repository:
python extract_dipoles.py --predictions-file data_files/predictions_bio_final.csv
The second script, filter_synthetic_reactions.py
, facilitates the selection of promising synthetic reactions, i.e., selective reactions that are fast under physiological conditions and can be expected to be irreversible:
python filter_synthetic_reactions.py --predictions-file <input .csv file containing predicted reaction and activation energies> [--threshold-dipolarophiles <threshold for the mean activation energy of a dipolarophile to gauge intrinsic reactivity>] [--threshold-reverse-barrier <threshold for the reverse barrier (to ensure irreversibility)>] [--max-g-act <maximal G_act for a dipole-dipolarophile combination to be considered suitable>]
In practice, the following command can be run to test this script within the repository:
python filter_synthetic_reactions.py --predictions-file data_files/predictions_synthetic_final_sample.csv
The final script, determine_potential.py
computes the bio-orthogonal potential, i.e., the energy difference between the activation energy for the synthetic reaction and the lowest activation energy of the dipole with any of the tested biologically inspired motifs:
python determine_potential.py --predictions-file <input .csv file containing predicted reaction and activation energies> --dipole-statistics-file <.csv file containing the statistics for the individual dipoles> [--output-file <.csv file to which the output of the screening will be written>]
In practice, the following command can be run to test this script within the repository:
python determine_potential.py --predictions-file filtered_synthetic_reactions.csv --dipole-statistics-file bio_filter_final/dipole_stat_biofrag.csv
The interactive plot can be generated by executing interactive_plot.ipynb
If (parts of) this workflow are used as part of a publication please cite the associated paper:
@article{stuyver2023machine,
title={Machine Learning-Guided Computational Screening of New Candidate Reactions with High Bioorthogonal Click Potential},
author={Stuyver, Thijs and Coley, Connor W},
journal={Chemistry--A European Journal},
pages={e202300387},
year={2023},
publisher={Wiley Online Library}
}
Additionally, please cite the paper in which the dataset generation procedure was presented:
@article{stuyver2023reaction,
title={Reaction profiles for quantum chemistry-computed [3+ 2] cycloaddition reactions},
author={Stuyver, Thijs and Jorner, Kjell and Coley, Connor W},
journal={Scientific Data},
volume={10},
number={1},
pages={66},
year={2023},
publisher={Nature Publishing Group UK London}
}
Furthermore, since the workflow makes heavy use of autodE, please also cite the paper in which this code was originally presented:
@article{autodE,
doi = {10.1002/anie.202011941},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202011941},
year = {2021},
publisher = {Wiley},
volume = {60},
number = {8},
pages = {4266--4274},
author = {Tom A. Young and Joseph J. Silcock and Alistair J. Sterling and Fernanda Duarte},
title = {{autodE}: Automated Calculation of Reaction Energy Profiles -- Application to Organic and Organometallic Reactions},
journal = {Angewandte Chemie International Edition}
}